Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The determination of theory by evidence: The case for quantum discontinuity, 1900?1915

6 references·16 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1985Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World2,460 cited
2020Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World2,007 cited
1969The conceptual development of quantum mechanics852 cited
1975On empirically equivalent systems of the world729 cited
1987The collected papers of Albert Einstein641 cited
1979Black Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity 1894–1912523 cited

Cited by

1994A philosophical study of the transition from the caloric theory of heat to thermodynamics: Resisting the pessimistic meta-induction93 cited
2017MUST EVIDENCE UNDERDETERMINE THEORY?90 cited
2019Constructing Quantum Mechanics75 cited
2006Underdetermination and Theory Succession from the Perspective of String Theory68 cited
2006Pauli's exclusion principle: the origin and validation of a scientific principle67 cited
2007Scientific Realism in the Age of String Theory65 cited
1994Science and certainty59 cited
2000How We Know about Electrons55 cited
2005Pauli's exclusion principle: the origin and validation of a scientific principle53 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2000The Scope, Limits, and Distinctiveness of the Method of 'Deduction from the Phenomena': Some Lessons from Newton's 'Demonstrations' in Optics50 cited

2003A Little Survey of Induction48 cited

2008The Crux of Crucial Experiments: Duhem's Problems and Inference to the Best Explanation39 cited

2011Arguing against fundamentality35 cited

2004What Demonstrative Induction Can Do Against the Threat of Underdetermination: Bohr, Heisenberg, and Pauli on Spectroscopic Anomalies (1921–24)28 cited

2011The Debate between Whewell and Mill on the Nature of Scientific Induction26 cited

2007A Philosopher's Guide to Empirical Success19 cited