Input uncertainty propagation methods and hazard mapping of geophysical mass flows

Abstract

This paper presents several standard and new methods for characterizing the effect of input data uncertainty on model output for hazardous geophysical mass flows. Note that we do not attempt here to characterize the inherent randomness of such flow events. We focus here on the problem of characterizing uncertainty in model output due to lack of knowledge of such input for a particular event. Methods applied include classical Monte Carlo and Latin hypercube sampling and more recent stochastic collocation, polynomial chaos, spectral projection and a newly developed extension thereof named polynomial chaos quadrature. The simple and robust samplings based Monte Carlo type methods are usually computationally intractable for reasonable physical models, while the more sophisticated and computationally efficient polynomial chaos method often breaks down for complex models. The spectral projection and polynomial chaos quadrature methods discussed here produce results of quality comparable to the polynomial chaos type methods while preserving the simplicity and robustness of the Monte Carlo‐type sampling based approaches at much lower cost. The computational efficiency, however, degrades with increasing numbers of random variables. A procedure for converting the output uncertainty characterization into a map showing the probability of a hazard threshold being exceeded is also presented. The uncertainty quantification procedures are applied first in simple settings to illustrate the procedure and then subsequently applied to the 1991 block‐and‐ash flows at Colima Volcano, Mexico.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 89 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.