Concept learning versus problem solving: There is a difference

Mary B. Nakhleh

237 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Chemical Education

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Science Education and Pedagogy Teaching and Learning Programming Chemistry Education and Research

Abstract

Previous studies indicate that there is little connection between algorithmic problem solving skills and conceptual understanding. The authors provide some ways to evaluate students along a continuum of low-high algorithmic and conceptual problem solving skills. The study shows that current lecture method teaches students to solve algorithms rather than teaching chemistry concepts.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 237 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1995Students' and teachers' misapplication of le chatelier's principle: Implications for the teaching of chemical equilibrium 2003Multidimensional analysis system for quantitative chemistry problems: Symbol, macro, micro, and process aspects 2018Effects of the Problem-Posing Approach on Students’ Problem Solving Skills and Metacognitive Awareness in Science Education 2006Misconceptions about the Particulate Nature of Matter. Using Animations To Close the Gender Gap 2002Promoting understanding of chemical bonding and spontaneity through student explanation and integration of ideas 2006Problem-Solving in Chemistry 2002Differential effects on the achievement of males and females of teaching the particulate nature of chemistry 1999Students’ Microscopic, Macroscopic, and Symbolic Representations of Chemical Reactions

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.