SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleA hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence

Floris Bex2010

OA

Articlegreen2010

A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence

Floris Bex · Peter J. Van Koppen · Henry Prakken · Bart Verheij A

120 citations·0/0 files stored·Artificial Intelligence and Law

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge Artificial Intelligence in Law

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 120 citations exist upstream.

References

2003The Uses of Argument 1978Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding : an inquiry into human knowledge structures. By Roger C. Schank and Robert P. Abelson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977. Pp. 248.1999Psychology Intelligence Analysis 1977The Probable and The Provable 2009Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence 1995The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning.1993Reasoning in explanation-based decision making 2005Analysis of Evidence

Cited by

2012A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law 2015Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspective 2014Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation 2016Bayes and the Law 2015Arguments, scenarios and probabilities: connections between three normative frameworks for evidential reasoning 2011Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2011Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemesarticle · 9 shared references 2015Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspectivearticle · 6 shared references 2016The Burdens of Proofbook · 6 shared references 2015Arguments, scenarios and probabilities: connections between three normative frameworks for evidential reasoningarticle · 6 shared references 2014To catch a thief with and without numbers: arguments, scenarios and probabilities in evidential reasoningarticle · 6 shared references 2012A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Lawarticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2010

Typearticle

Published2010-06-01

VenueArtificial Intelligence and Law

ISSN-L0924-8463

Languageen

Citations120

Files0 public / 0

ShelfLegal processes and jurisprudence

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s10506-010-9092-x

openalex_workW2010366788

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2012Burdens and standards of proof for inference to the best explanation: three case studies

2011Avoiding probabilistic reasoning fallacies in legal practice using Bayesian networks