SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
After 30 years, what do we know about what jurors know? A meta-analytic review of lay knowledge regarding eyewitness factors.
4 references·13 citing·36 second hop
After 30 years, what do we know about what jurors know? A meta-analytic review of lay knowledge regarding eyewitness factors. (2010)After 30 years, what do we know about wha…The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? (1999)The ecological validity of ju…Manuscript Preparation (1997)Manuscript PreparationThe eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. (1989)The eyewitness, the expert ps…Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior? (1982)Do jurors share a common unde…Experiments (2024)ExperimentsJudicial Decision-Making. A Survey of the Experimental Evidence (2022)Judicial Decision-Making. A S…Evaluating witness testimony: Juror knowledge, false memory, and the utility of evidence-based directions (2021)Evaluating witness testimony:…Mock Juror Perceptions of Witness Inattentional Blindness (2020)Mock Juror Perceptions of Wit…Improving juror sensitivity to specific eyewitness factors: judicial instructions fail the test (2020)Improving juror sensitivity t…Factoring the Role of Eyewitness Evidence in the Courtroom (2020)Factoring the Role of Eyewitn…Can the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony be improved? (2020)Can the effectiveness of eyew…Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt (2018)Modelling the effects of crim…Improving the effectiveness of the Henderson instruction safeguard against unreliable eyewitness identification (2017)Improving the effectiveness o…HendersonInstructions: Do They Enhance Evidence Evaluation? (2017)HendersonInstructions: Do The…Comparing the effectiveness of Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors’ evaluations of eyewitness evidence? (2017)Comparing the effectiveness o…Are the misinformed more punitive? Beliefs and misconceptions in forensic psychology (2013)Are the misinformed more puni…A Teaching Aid for Improving Jurors' Assessments of Eyewitness Accuracy (2012)A Teaching Aid for Improving …Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. (1979)Designing experiments and analyzing data: a model comparison perspective (1990)Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. (1998)The Novel New Jersey Eyewitness Instruction Induces Skepticism But Not Sensitivity (2014)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. (1987)Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis (1989)Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. (1997)The other-race effect in eyewitness identification: What do we do about it? (2001)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)Criminal Justice and Behavior (1980)College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. (1986)Experimental practices in economics: A challenge for psychologists? (2000)Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. (2001)Analyzing the expert judge: A descriptive study of a stockbroker's decision process. (1969)Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. (1997)Actual Innocence : Five Days to Execution and Other Dispatches from the Wrongly Convicted (2000)High eyewitness confidence is always compelling: that’s a problem (2022)Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. (1985)Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. (1992)An Analysis of the New York City Police Department's “Stop-and-Frisk” Policy in the Context of Claims of Racial Bias (2007)Extraneous factors in judicial decisions (2011)Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision making. (1996)Police Officers' Perceptions of Eyewitness Performance in Forensic Investigations (1998)Attitudes Toward the Police: The Effects of Direct and Vicarious Experience (2005)The effect of victim intoxication and crime type on mock jury decision-making (2023)The Psychology of Ignorance (2026)Racial Bias in Mock Juror Decision-Making: A Meta-Analytic Review of Defendant Treatment. (2005)Statistics for Experimenters (2006)The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. (1983)Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation. (1988)The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors' perceptions of the child witness. (1990)A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. (2006)Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German (2006)Content Knowledge for Teaching (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Manuscript Preparation3,915 cited
  • 1999The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?682 cited
  • 1982Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior?141 cited
  • 1989The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury.119 cited

Cited by

  • 2012A Teaching Aid for Improving Jurors' Assessments of Eyewitness Accuracy46 cited
  • 2017Comparing the effectiveness of Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors’ evaluations of eyewitness evidence?35 cited
  • 2017HendersonInstructions: Do They Enhance Evidence Evaluation?27 cited
  • 2020Factoring the Role of Eyewitness Evidence in the Courtroom26 cited
  • 2020Mock Juror Perceptions of Witness Inattentional Blindness25 cited
  • 2018Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt21 cited
  • 2020Can the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony be improved?20 cited
  • 2017Improving the effectiveness of the Henderson instruction safeguard against unreliable eyewitness identification19 cited
  • 2013Are the misinformed more punitive? Beliefs and misconceptions in forensic psychology18 cited
  • 2021Evaluating witness testimony: Juror knowledge, false memory, and the utility of evidence-based directions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

17 cited
  • 2020Improving juror sensitivity to specific eyewitness factors: judicial instructions fail the test14 cited
  • 2022Judicial Decision-Making. A Survey of the Experimental Evidence6 cited
  • 2024Experiments2 cited