SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Effects of Client and Preparer Risk Factors on Workpaper Review Effectiveness
16 references·1 citing·43 second hop
The Effects of Client and Preparer Risk Factors on Workpaper Review Effectiveness (2007)The Effects of Client and Preparer Risk F…Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit (2019)Consideration of Fraud in a F…Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (2008)Financial Accounting Standard…Reviewers' Responses to Anticipated Stylization Attempts by Preparers of Audit Workpapers (2003)Reviewers' Responses to Antic…Error Detection by Industry‐Specialized Teams during Sequential Audit Review (2002)Error Detection by Industry‐S…Audit Review: Managers' Interpersonal Expectations and Conduct of the Review* (2002)Audit Review: Managers' Inter…Do Auditors Objectively Evaluate Their Subordinates' Work? (2001)Do Auditors Objectively Evalu…Hierarchical Differences in Audit Workpaper Review Performance* (1999)Hierarchical Differences in A…Auditor Attention to and Judgments of Aggressive Financial Reporting (1999)Auditor Attention to and Judg…The effects of audit risk and information importance on auditor memory during working paper review. (1998)The effects of audit risk and…The audit review process: A characterization from the persuasion perspective (1997)The audit review process: A c…An Investigation of the Effects of Specialization in Audit Workpaper Review* (1997)An Investigation of the Effec…Empirical Evidence on the Functional Relation between Audit Planning and Total Audit Effort (1996)Empirical Evidence on the Fun…Senior/Manager Differences in Audit Workpaper Review Performance (1994)Senior/Manager Differences in…Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment (1993)Determinants of judgment perf…The effects of the planning memorandum, time pressure and individual auditor characteristics on audit managers' review time judgments* (1987)The effects of the planning m…The Review Process and the Accuracy of Auditor Judgments (1985)The Review Process and the Ac…Audit roles and the review process: workpaper preparers’ and reviewers’ differing perspectives (2019)Audit roles and the review pr…Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one? (1982)What Do Industry-Specialist Auditors Know? (1999)Audit Firm Industry Specialization as a Differentiation Strategy: Evidence from Fees Charged to Firms Going Public (2003)Form versus Substance: The Implications for Auditing Practice and Research of Alternative Perspectives on Corporate Governance (2008)Reducing Restatements with Increased Industry Expertise* (2009)Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. (1980)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)Mental Models (1983)Predecisional Distortion of Evidence as a Consequence of Real-Time Audit Review (2002)Electronic versus Face-to-Face Review: The Effects of Alternative Forms of Review on Auditors' Performance (2004)The Effect of the Social Mismatch between Staff Auditors and Client Management on the Collection of Audit Evidence (2012)Determinants of Auditor Expertise (1990)The Effects of Corporate Governance Experience and Financial-Reporting and Audit Knowledge on Audit Committee Members' Judgments (2001)Research Methods in Accounting (2003)The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing (2020)Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. (1980)Performance appraisal : assessing human behavior at work (1984)Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. (1985)Judgment and Decision Making Research in Auditing: A Task, Person, and Interpersonal Interaction Perspective (2005)Audit Quality Indicators: Insights from the Academic Literature (2012)The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Auditor Expertise and Human Capital Development (2018)The philosophy of auditing. (1964)Group process and productivity (1972)Quality of group judgment. (1977)Factors affecting judgmental forecasts and confidence intervals (1989)The changing technological environment and the future of behavioural research in accounting (2016)Expertise in Problem Solving. (1981)The effect of audit seniors’ decisions on working paper documentation and on partners’ decisions (1999)Closing the Loop: Review Process Factors Affecting Audit Staff Follow-Through (2011)Expertise and Intelligent Thinking: When Is It Worse to Know Better? (2014)The Effects of Time Pressure and Audit Program Structure on Audit Performance (1990)Debiasing Audit Judgment with Accountability: A Framework and Experimental Results (1993)How Do Audit Workpaper Reviewers Cope with the Conflicting Pressures of Detecting Misstatements and Balancing Client Workloads? (2010)Making sense of soft information: interpretation bias and loan quality (2019)The meaning of a defined accounting concept: regulatory changes and the effect on auditor decision making (2001)The Role of Incentives to Manage Earnings and Quantification in Auditors' Evaluations of Management-Provided Information (2004)Audit quality and COVID-19 restrictions (2022)Detecting false financial statements using published data: some evidence from Greece (2002)Financial Statement Fraud: Insights from the Academic Literature (2008)Narcissus Enters the Courtroom: CEO Narcissism and Fraud (2012)The World Price of Earnings Opacity (2003)The Information Role of Conservatism (2008)An Examination of Corporate Tax Shelter Participants (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)1,095 cited
  • 1993Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment680 cited
  • 2019Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit407 cited
  • 2002Error Detection by Industry‐Specialized Teams during Sequential Audit Review391 cited
  • 1997The audit review process: A characterization from the persuasion perspective235 cited
  • 2002Audit Review: Managers' Interpersonal Expectations and Conduct of the Review*127 cited
  • 2001Do Auditors Objectively Evaluate Their Subordinates' Work?114 cited
  • 1994Senior/Manager Differences in Audit Workpaper Review Performance114 cited
  • 1985The Review Process and the Accuracy of Auditor Judgments95 cited
  • 1999Auditor Attention to and Judgments of Aggressive Financial Reporting91 cited
  • 1996Empirical Evidence on the Functional Relation between Audit Planning and Total Audit Effort79 cited
  • 2003Reviewers' Responses to Anticipated Stylization Attempts by Preparers of Audit Workpapers65 cited
  • 1997An Investigation of the Effects of Specialization in Audit Workpaper Review*47 cited
  • 1998The effects of audit risk and information importance on auditor memory during working paper review.45 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1999Hierarchical Differences in Audit Workpaper Review Performance*44 cited
  • 1987The effects of the planning memorandum, time pressure and individual auditor characteristics on audit managers' review time judgments*42 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Audit roles and the review process: workpaper preparers’ and reviewers’ differing perspectives21 cited