References

• 1967Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness8,410 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
• 1989Measurement of health status4,979 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)2,798 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision2,681 cited
• 2019Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses2,667 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency2,318 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness1,838 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias1,817 cited
• 2008Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses1,795 cited
• 2002Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures1,505 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence1,335 cited
• 2012GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes836 cited
• 2012GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes761 cited
• 1995Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests.