Models of second language competence: a structural equation approach

Fritz Sang · B. Schmitz · Juergen Baumert · Peter Martin Roeder

45 citations0/0 files storedLanguage Testing

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Linguistic Education and Pedagogy

Abstract

Starting with a critical discussion of the consensus reached concerning the structure of second language competence, the unitary competence hypothesis as advocated especially by Oller (1976) is then confronted with new evidence supporting a multidimensional model of foreign language ability. In order to question the plausibility of the general (unitary) factor hypothesis, its central claim, that of universal validity, is put to the test. This claim implies at least two assumptions: a) the invariance of the general factor, regardless of differences in the populations studied, and b) the invariance of this factor irrespective of the conditions under which language acquisition takes place. By showing divergent structures in subgroups of high and low first language ability, the first assumption would be falsified. By demonstrating specific influences of two teaching styles on different language components, the second assumption could be disproved. The analyses are based on data from a sample of 14 000 seventh grade students and their teachers from 427 secondary schools ('Gymnasien') being highly representative for West Germany and West Berlin. The hypotheses were tested using confirmatory factor analysis (LISREL). The results obtained show the appropriateness of the three factor model proposed (ELEMENTARY, COMPLEX, COMMUNICATIVE), which is theoretically meaningful and best fits the data. Moreover, the expected effects of first language ability grouping and of teaching strategies on the structure of second language competence clearly emerge. In spite of the limitations of the data set analysed, these results can all be interpreted as strong and further evidence against a single factor model (and its educational implications) and in favour of a multiple factor model as outlined above. Finally, didactical consequences of these findings are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 45 citations exist upstream.

References

1980Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.1980THEORETICAL BASES OF COMMUNICATIVE APPROACHES TO SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING AND TESTING 1980THEORETICAL BASES OF COMMUNICATIVE APPROACHES TO SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING AND TESTING 1980Multivariate Analysis with Latent Variables: Causal Modeling 1970Testing English as a Second Language 1984Language Proficiency and Academic Achievement 1979The Cloze Procedure and Proficiency in English as a Foreign Language 1980Research in language testing

Cited by

2011Structural Equation Modeling in Language Testing and Learning Research: A Review 2011Factor structure of the revised TOEIC ® test: A multiple-sample analysis 1988Task and ability analysis as a basis for examining content and construct comparability in two EFL proficiency test batteries 2013Review of Sample Size for Structural Equation Models in Second Language Testing and Learning Research: A Monte Carlo Approach 1988Language testing. Part 1

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.