SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Toward a New Model of Scientific Publishing: Discussion and a Proposal
4 references·16 citing·53 second hop
Toward a New Model of Scientific Publishing: Discussion and a Proposal (2011)Toward a New Model of Scientific Publishi…Journal peer review in context: A qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing (2011)Journal peer review in contex…Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science (2008)Why Current Publication Pract…Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Effect of open peer review on…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer-review practices of psyc…Female Dynamics in Authorship of Scientific Publications in the Public Library of Science: A 10-year Bibliometric Analysis of Biomedical Research (2023)Female Dynamics in Authorship…Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals (2022)Scientific Publishing in Biom…Honest signaling in academic publishing (2021)Honest signaling in academic …The relationship of polarity of post-publication peer review to citation count (2020)The relationship of polarity …Reliable novelty: New should not trump true (2019)Reliable novelty: New should …The effectiveness of journals as arbiters of scientific impact (2018)The effectiveness of journals…The perceived feasibility of methods to reduce publication bias (2017)The perceived feasibility of …Peer Review: From “Sacred Ideals” to “Profane Realities” (2017)Peer Review: From “Sacred Ide…Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior (2016)Fortifying the Corrective Nat…ASM Journals Eliminate Impact Factor Information from Journal Websites (2016)ASM Journals Eliminate Impact…Strategies towards Evaluation beyond Scientific Impact. Pathways not only for Agricultural Research (2015)Strategies towards Evaluation…Impacted Science: Impact Is Not Importance (2015)Impacted Science: Impact Is N…Using science and psychology to improve the dissemination and evaluation of scientific work (2014)Using science and psychology …Designing next-generation platforms for evaluating scientific output: what scientists can learn from the social web (2012)Designing next-generation pla…An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing (2012)An emerging consensus for ope…Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings (2012)Aggregating post-publication …Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. (1994)Constructing grounded theory : a practical guide through qualitative analysis (2006)Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis (2006)Peer review motivation frames: A qualitative approach (2015)Criteria for assessing grant applications: a systematic review (2020)Motivations for performing scholarly prepublication peer review: A scoping review (2020)Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations (2008)Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation (2012)Tracking Replicability as a Method of Post-Publication Open Evaluation (2012)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)Does open peer review improve citation count? Evidence from a propensity score matching analysis of PeerJ (2020)Toward a new economics of science (1994)A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. (2003)The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes (2010)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Scientific Utopia (2012)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Toward an experimental ecology of human development. (1977)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011)The Significance of Insecure and Disorganized Attachment for Children’s Internalizing Symptoms: A Meta-Analytic Study (2012)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences (2016)Journal Impact Factor: A Bumpy Ride in an Open Space (2019)Women Are Underrepresented and Receive Differential Outcomes at ASM Journals: a Six-Year Retrospective Analysis (2020)The Impact Factor Game (2006)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Challenges to open peer review (2018)Do Legitimate Publishers Benefit or Profit from Error, Misconduct or Fraud? (2021)Sustained Rise in Retractions in the Life Sciences Literature during the Pandemic Years 2020 and 2021 (2022)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Bifurcated Conversations in Sociological Studies of Religion and Gender (2017)Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* (2018)Peer Review as an Evolving Response to Organizational Constraint: Evidence from Sociology Journals, 1952–2018 (2020)Towards theorizing peer review (2022)HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)Publication of Randomized Clinical Trials in Pediatric Research (2018)Open laboratory notebooks: good for science, good for society, good for scientists (2019)Institutionalizing Open Science in Africa: Limitations and Prospects (2022)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Integrity at stake: confronting “publish or perish” in the developing world and emerging economies (2024)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
  • 2008Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science502 cited
  • 1999Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial415 cited
  • 2011Journal peer review in context: A qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing68 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Impacted Science: Impact Is Not Importance66 cited
  • 2022Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals52 cited
  • 2017The perceived feasibility of methods to reduce publication bias51 cited
  • 2012An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing48 cited
  • 2017Peer Review: From “Sacred Ideals” to “Profane Realities”46 cited
  • 2016Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior39 cited
  • 2019Reliable novelty: New should not trump true38 cited
  • 2021Honest signaling in academic publishing37 cited
  • 2016ASM Journals Eliminate Impact Factor Information from Journal Websites30 cited
  • 2014Using science and psychology to improve the dissemination and evaluation of scientific work

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

26 cited
  • 2015Strategies towards Evaluation beyond Scientific Impact. Pathways not only for Agricultural Research23 cited
  • 2012Designing next-generation platforms for evaluating scientific output: what scientists can learn from the social web20 cited
  • 2012Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings20 cited
  • 2018The effectiveness of journals as arbiters of scientific impact18 cited
  • 2023Female Dynamics in Authorship of Scientific Publications in the Public Library of Science: A 10-year Bibliometric Analysis of Biomedical Research13 cited
  • 2020The relationship of polarity of post-publication peer review to citation count13 cited