SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Interrogating p -values
10 references·1 citing·44 second hop
Interrogating p -values (2013)Interrogating p -valuesReplication, statistical consistency, and publication bias (2013)Replication, statistical cons…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyOf Beauty, Sex and Power (2009)Of Beauty, Sex and PowerOf beauty, sex, and power: Statistical challenges in estimating small eects (2008)Of beauty, sex, and power: St…Is Psychometrics Pathological Science? (2008)Is Psychometrics Pathological…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Psychometrics is Not Pathological (2004)Why Psychometrics is Not Path…Normal Science, Pathological Science and Psychometrics (2000)Normal Science, Pathological …Pathological Science (1989)Pathological ScienceWe should focus on the biases that matter: A reply to commentaries (2013)We should focus on the biases…The human sex ratio. Part 1: A review of the literature. (1987)Determinants of the sex ratio at birth: Review of recent literature (1988)Trivers–Willard at birth and one year: evidence from US natality data 1983–2001 (2007)When is statistical significance not significant? (2013)Statistical learning and dyslexia: a systematic review (2016)Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research (2017)Construct validity in psychological tests. (1955)Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests (1961)Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1969)Quantitative Data From Rating Scales: An Epistemological and Methodological Enquiry (2018)Values in Psychometrics (2021)Psychometric properties of sum scores and factor scores differ even when their correlation is 0.98: A response to Widaman and Revelle (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The Principles of Psychology (1891)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Arbitrary metrics in psychology. (2006)Construct Validity: Advances in Theory and Methodology (2008)Item Response Theory and Clinical Measurement (2008)The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (1953)Putting Typologies to Work (2012)Assessment and learning: fields apart? (2017)Theoretically Informed Generative Models Can Advance the Psychological and Brain Sciences: Lessons from the Reliability Paradox (2020)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)The New Statistics (2013)Beauty in the classroom: instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity (2005)Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes (2005)Perceived Intelligence Is Associated with Measured Intelligence in Men but Not Women (2014)Ethics and Statistics: Honesty and Transparency Are Not Enough (2017)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)You Cannot Step Into the Same River Twice (2014)Just out of reach: On the reliability of the action-sentence compatibility effect. (2015)Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12 (2016)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)Six domains of research ethics (2002)Scientific myth‐conceptions (2003)Teaching the nature of science through scientific errors (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2000Normal Science, Pathological Science and Psychometrics267 cited
  • 2008Is Psychometrics Pathological Science?193 cited
  • 2009Of Beauty, Sex and Power137 cited
  • 1989Pathological Science125 cited
  • 2013Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias123 cited
  • 2004Why Psychometrics is Not Pathological87 cited
  • 2008Of beauty, sex, and power: Statistical challenges in estimating small eects29 cited

Cited by

  • 2013We should focus on the biases that matter: A reply to commentaries10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work