Article1966

MANUFACTURING PROGRESS FUNCTIONS II. SELECTION OF TRAINEES AND CONTROL OF THEIR PROGRESS

19 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Production Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation Vocational Education and Training Management and Optimization Techniques

Abstract

SUMMARY SUMMARY In Part I (Glover, 1965) it was shown that the model ∑y+C =a(∑,x)m could be used to describe all cases of learning in industry, whether of individuals learning a particular skill, or of complete factories learning to produce a new product. The development of the CULOG form of learning curve was discussed. In the present paper consideration is given to the selection of trainees and a method of monitoring their progress so that the occurrence of “plateaus” of learning is minimised.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.

References

1976Motion and Time Study 1952Manufacturing Progress Functions 1973Ageing and human skill

Cited by

1990Forecasting learning curves 1970SOME IMPROVEMENT CURVE THEORY 1978Productivity drift in extended learning curves 1979Analytical modeling of nuclear power station operator reliability 1990A model for the economic evaluation of training alternatives for complex logging tasks

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.