SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Systematic reviews are not biased by results from trials stopped early for benefit · Study

ReviewSystematic reviews are not biased by results from trials stopped early for benefit

Steven N. Goodman2007

Review2007

Systematic reviews are not biased by results from trials stopped early for benefit

Steven N. Goodman

21 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

References

2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials 2001A comparison of statistical methods for meta‐analysis 2007Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit 1992The Impact of Stopping Rules on Heterogeneity of Results in Overviews of Clinical Trials

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2013Meta‐analysis of clinical trials with early stopping: an investigation of potential biasarticle · 2 shared references 2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groupsarticle · 1 shared reference 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trialsreview · 1 shared reference 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiativearticle · 1 shared reference 2011CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsarticle · 1 shared reference 2005A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpointsarticle · 1 shared reference

Details

Year2007

Typereview

Published2007-12-06

VenueJournal of Clinical Epidemiology

ISSN-L0895-4356

Languageen

Citations21

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.06.012

openalex_workW2011773995

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.