SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic reviews are not biased by results from trials stopped early for benefit
4 references·0 citing·19 second hop
Systematic reviews are not biased by results from trials stopped early for benefit (2007)Systematic reviews are not biased by resu…Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit (2007)Systematic reviewers neglect …The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…A comparison of statistical methods for meta‐analysis (2001)A comparison of statistical m…The Impact of Stopping Rules on Heterogeneity of Results in Overviews of Clinical Trials (1992)The Impact of Stopping Rules …Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey (2004)Reflections on meta-analyses involving trials stopped early for benefit: Is there a problem and if so, what is it? (2011)Meta‐analysis of clinical trials with early stopping: an investigation of potential bias (2013)A unified framework for bias assessment in clinical research (2019)Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings across Studies (1984)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings across Studies (1986)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level (2008)Destination image and tourist loyalty: A meta-analysis (2013)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 2001A comparison of statistical methods for meta‐analysis571 cited
  • 2007Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit63 cited
  • 1992The Impact of Stopping Rules on Heterogeneity of Results in Overviews of Clinical Trials34 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work