MANAGEMENT HISTORIANS AND BUSINESS HISTORIANS: DIFFERING PERCEPTIONS OF PIONEER CONTRIBUTORS.

Unknown author

48 citations0/0 files storedAcademy of Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy, History, and Historiography Biographical and Historical Analysis Management Theory and Practice

Abstract

At the 1974 meeting of the Academy of Management, it was proposed that the Academy's Management History Division find some appropriate ways to honor outstanding individuals who had contributed the ...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 48 citations exist upstream.

References

1964A Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness 1975Unreliability of difference scores: A paradox for measurement of change.

Cited by

2015The Limits and Possibilities of History: How a Wider, Deeper, and More Engaged Understanding of Business History Can Foster Innovative Thinking 2010The role played by Frederick Taylor in the rise of the academic management fields 2014Discovering the foundational philosophies, practices, and influences of modern management theory 2002Analysing the thinking of F.W. Taylor using cognitive mapping 2015The historical evolution of employee engagement and self-efficacy constructs 2014History, field definition and management studies: the case of the New Deal 2010Management pioneer contributors: 30‐year review 2013Classical and neoclassical approaches of management: An overview

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.