SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al. · Study

WorkOn the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al.

Alex Biedermann2014

Work2014

On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al.

Alex Biedermann · Tacha Hicks · Franco Taroni · Christophe Champod · Colin G. G. Aitken

15 citations·0/0 files stored·Science & Justice

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Criminal Law and Evidence Jury Decision Making Processes

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 15 citations exist upstream.

References

1996Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists 2004Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists 1998A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework 2009Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion 2000The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements 2000More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions 2006Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, by Colin G. G. Aitken and Franco Taroni: 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, 2004.1998A Bayesian approach to interpreting footwear marks in forensic casework

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2018A response to “Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look” by Lund and Iyerarticle · 8 shared references 2012E-learning initiatives in forensic interpretation: Report on experiences from current projects and outlookarticle · 8 shared references 2019Bayesian networks for the interpretation of biological evidencearticle · 6 shared references 2016The evaluation of exclusionary DNA results: a discussion of issues inRv.Drummondarticle · 6 shared references 2016Current perspectives in the interpretation of gunshot residues in forensic science: A reviewreview · 5 shared references 2009Probabilistic evidential assessment of gunshot residue particle evidence (Part I): Likelihood ratio calculation and case pre-assessment using Bayesian networksarticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2014

Typeother

Published2014-05-02

VenueScience & Justice

ISSN-L1355-0306

Languageen

Citations15

Files0 public / 0

ShelfLegal processes and jurisprudence

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.scijus.2014.04.001

openalex_workW2011918953

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.