References

• 1996Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists567 cited
• 2004Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists566 cited
• 1998A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework454 cited
• 2009Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion252 cited
• 2000The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements209 cited
• 2000More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions177 cited
• 2006Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, by Colin G. G. Aitken and Franco Taroni: 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, 2004.91 cited
• 1998A Bayesian approach to interpreting footwear marks in forensic casework73 cited
• 1993Establishing the evidential value of a small quantity of material found at a crime scene56 cited
• 2010Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion Association of Forensic Science Providers55 cited
• 2013When ‘neutral’ evidence still has probative value (with implications from the Barry George Case)43 cited
• 2006An extended likelihood ratio framework for interpreting evidence43 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.