SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Understanding the needs of international authors
6 references·0 citing·26 second hop
Understanding the needs of international authors (2013)Understanding the needs of international …Top 10 Tips for Responding to Reviewer and Editor Comments (2011)Top 10 Tips for Responding to…Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments (2009)Peer review process in medica…The changing scholarly communication landscape: an international survey of senior researchers (2005)The changing scholarly commun…Responding to Reviewers' Comments on Submitted Articles (2002)Responding to Reviewers' Comm…US and Non-US Submissions (1998)US and Non-US SubmissionsGENDER FACTORS IN REVIEWER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANUSCRIPT PUBLICATION (1990)GENDER FACTORS IN REVIEWER RE…Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage (1987)Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings (1992)Genre analysis : English in academic and research settings. By John M. Swales (Cambridge applied linguistics series.) Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Pp. 260. Cloth $34.50, paper $15.95. (1993)Publishing research in English-language journals: Attitudes, strategies and difficulties of multilingual scholars of medicine (2014)Chinese academics writing for publication: English teachers as text mediators (2016)Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal (2023)Are women prejudiced against women? (1968)Evaluation of the performance of women as a function of their sex, achievement, and personal history. (1971)What's in an author's name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author's name (1985)The Review Process at PSPB: Correlates of Interreviewer Agreement and Manuscript Acceptance (1999)To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review (2009)Uncovering Latent Biases in Text: Method and Application to Peer Review (2021)Publishing and presenting clinical research (1999)Writing and Publishing in Medicine (1999)Supporting student and teacher feedback literacy: an instructional model for student feedback processes (2021)Enhancing scholarly discourse in the age of artificial intelligence: A guided approach to effective peer review process. (2023)Key Guidelines for Responding to Reviewers (2024)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Open Access Increases Citation Rate (2006)Journal selection criteria in an open access environment: A comparison between the medicine and social sciences (2017)Research output availability on academic social networks: implications for stakeholders in academic publishing (2017)A Pragmatic Approach to Getting Published: 35 Tips for Early Career Researchers (2016)Improving peer review: What authors can do (2017)Scholarship in Emergency Medicine: A Primer for Junior Academics Part I: Writing and Publishing (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1998US and Non-US Submissions318 cited
  • 2009Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments107 cited
  • 1990GENDER FACTORS IN REVIEWER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANUSCRIPT PUBLICATION85 cited
  • 2005The changing scholarly communication landscape: an international survey of senior researchers71 cited
  • 2002Responding to Reviewers' Comments on Submitted Articles39 cited
  • 2011Top 10 Tips for Responding to Reviewer and Editor Comments29 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work