Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Quantifying Quality: Can Quantitative Data (“Metrics”) Explain the 2001 RAE Ratings for Social Policy and Administration?

9 references·4 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1997Nepotism and sexism in peer-review1,346 cited
2003A Future for Higher Education?437 cited
1997Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation262 cited
1992A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine212 cited
1999Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen?97 cited
1998Misleading, unscientific, and unjust: the United Kingdom's research assessment exercise80 cited
1996The judge, the model of the judge, and the model of the judged as judge: Analyses of the UK 1992 research assessment exercise data for business and management studies45 cited
1995A Statistical Analysis of the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise35 cited
2003Great expectations: The social sciences in Britain31 cited

Cited by

2004Institutional repositories and research assessment18 cited
2011Social Policy Excellence – Peer Review or Metrics? Analyzing the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise in Social Work and Social Policy and Administration16 cited
2006Social Policy & Administration: Journal and Discipline8 cited
2006Defining 'quality' in social policy research1 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work