Repeating items to estimate the test-retest reliability of task inventory ratings.

Mark A. Wilson · Barry A. Macy

27 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Applied Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Psychological Testing and Assessment Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

Abstract

Our purpose in this study is to explore two questions concerning the test-retest reliability of task inventories. First, what effect does the inclusion of data from inconsistent respondents have on reliability? Second, is the reliability of individual task rating scales affected when they are part of a multiscale inventory?

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 27 citations exist upstream.

References

1982Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences.1988The Job analysis handbook for business, industry, and government 1980A comparison of holistic and decomposed judgment strategies in job analyses by job incumbents.1986AN EVALUATION OF METHODS TO SELECT RESPONDENTS TO STRUCTURED JOB‐ANALYSIS QUESTIONNAIRES 1964JOB ANALYSIS IN THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE1 1983WITHIN CLASSIFICATION JOB DIFFERENCES

Cited by

2003Interrater Reliability in Job Analysis: Differences in Strategy and Perspective

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.