SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: “STROBE-RDS” statement
7 references·9 citing·38 second hop
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: “STROBE-RDS” statement (2015)Strengthening the Reporting of Observatio…Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting o…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting o…Modern Epidemiology 3rd edition (1986)Modern Epidemiology 3rd editi…REFORMS: Consensus-based Recommendations for Machine-learning-based Science (2024)REFORMS: Consensus-based Reco…Uncovering SARS-COV-2 vaccine uptake and COVID-19 impacts among First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples living in Toronto and London, Ontario (2022)Uncovering SARS-COV-2 vaccine…Process and components of disaster risk communication in health systems: A thematic analysis (2022)Process and components of dis…“One for the money”? The impact of the “disk crisis” on “ordinary musicians” income: The case of French speaking Switzerland (2021)“One for the money”? The impa…The Decline of the Experimental Paradigm During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Template for the Future (2020)The Decline of the Experiment…More comprehensive reporting of methods in studies using respondent driven sampling is required: a systematic review of the uptake of the STROBE-RDS guidelines (2019)More comprehensive reporting …A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensions (2018)A cross-sectional bibliometri…The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement (2017)The STROBE extensions: protoc…Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement (2017)Evaluation of the Quality of …Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Quality of observational studies in prestigious journals of occupational medicine and health based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: a cross-sectional study (2018)Adherence to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist in articles published in EAACI Journals: A bibliographic study (2021)Poor reporting quality of observational clinical studies comparing treatments of COVID-19 – a retrospective cross-sectional study (2022)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) (2007)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement (2009)Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements (2016)Risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions showed low inter-rater reliability and challenges in its application (2019)Completeness of reporting of case reports in high‐impact medical journals (2020)Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research (2020)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations (2019)Aligning generalization between humans and machines (2025)Evaluating dental AI research papers: Key considerations for editors and reviewers (2025)Why an overreliance on AI-driven modelling is bad for science (2025)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3 (2013)Sleep problems and work injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2013)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (2017)Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,756 cited
  • 2008The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies17,743 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration8,588 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration3,542 cited
  • 1986Modern Epidemiology 3rd edition1,724 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited

Cited by

  • 2024REFORMS: Consensus-based Recommendations for Machine-learning-based Science144 cited
  • 2018A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensions47 cited
  • 2017Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement47 cited
  • 2022Uncovering SARS-COV-2 vaccine uptake and COVID-19 impacts among First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples living in Toronto and London, Ontario32 cited
  • 2022Process and components of disaster risk communication in health systems: A thematic analysis22 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2019
More comprehensive reporting of methods in studies using respondent driven sampling is required: a systematic review of the uptake of the STROBE-RDS guidelines
22 cited
  • 2017The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement20 cited
  • 2020The Decline of the Experimental Paradigm During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Template for the Future14 cited
  • 2021“One for the money”? The impact of the “disk crisis” on “ordinary musicians” income: The case of French speaking Switzerland14 cited