SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methodology and Reporting Quality of Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine
5 references·9 citing·41 second hop
Methodology and Reporting Quality of Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2007)Methodology and Reporting Quality of Syst…Mejora de la calidad de los informes de los metaanálisis de los ensayos clínicos controlados: el acuerdo QUOROM (2000)Mejora de la calidad de los i…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles (1994)Systematic Reviews: Checklist…Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the…Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines (2019)Reporting quality of Cochrane…Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews (2017)Impact of librarians on repor…Reporting and methodological qualities of published surgical meta-analyses (2015)Reporting and methodological …Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of meta-analyses of observational studies published in Chinese journals (2015)Epidemiology, quality and rep…Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews (2012)Reliability and External Vali…Risk of Bias Tool in Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture in Chinese Journals (2011)Risk of Bias Tool in Systemat…The Quality of Meta-Analyses of Genetic Association Studies: A Review With Recommendations (2009)The Quality of Meta-Analyses …Methodological quality of systematic reviews analyzing the use of laser therapy in restorative dentistry (2009)Methodological quality of sys…Assessing the Reporting and Scientific Quality of Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials of Treatments for Anxiety Disorders (2008)Assessing the Reporting and S…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Methodological quality and risk‐of‐bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri‐implantitis (2019)Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the treatment of proximal humeral fractures (2021)Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients—A methodological study (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)Impact of choice of quality appraisal tool for systematic reviews in overviews (2014)Meditative Movement Therapies and Health-Related Quality-of-Life in Adults: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses (2015)“Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review” (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1994)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF): properties and frontier of current knowledge (2010)Burnout in university teaching staff: a systematic literature review (2011)How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests (1994)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions (2011)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Mind-Body Medicine: State of the Science, Implications for Practice (2003)Pharmacotherapy for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (2006)Meta-analysis of stigma and mental health (2007)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals (2014)Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles480 cited
  • 2000Mejora de la calidad de los informes de los metaanálisis de los ensayos clínicos controlados: el acuerdo QUOROM213 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Reporting and methodological qualities of published surgical meta-analyses43 cited
  • 2009The Quality of Meta-Analyses of Genetic Association Studies: A Review With Recommendations39 cited
  • 2012Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews35 cited
  • 2011Risk of Bias Tool in Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture in Chinese Journals20 cited
  • 2019Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines18 cited
  • 2015Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of meta-analyses of observational studies published in Chinese journals16 cited
  • 2009Methodological quality of systematic reviews analyzing the use of laser therapy in restorative dentistry14 cited
  • 2017Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

14 cited
  • 2008Assessing the Reporting and Scientific Quality of Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials of Treatments for Anxiety Disorders12 cited