“The Unbearable Lightness of Cleaning”: Representations of Domestic Practice and Products in Good Housekeeping Magazine (UK): 1951–2001

Lydia Martens · Sue Scott

35 citations0/0 files storedConsumption Markets & Culture

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

American History and Culture Media, Gender, and Advertising Education, Sociology, Communication Studies

Abstract

In this paper we begin to open the black box that constitutes the organisation of domestic cleaning and consumption in the latter half of the twentieth century. We focus specifically on change and continuity in the manner in which cleaning practices and cleaning products are represented in the UK woman's magazine Good Housekeeping, in the late modern period. After a discussion of the modern history of cleanliness, we proceed with a rationale for why this magazine was chosen for our analysis, followed by a summary of our methodology. We then argue that three phases of representation may be delineated in the time period we investigated. The first phase, which is apparent in the 1951 and 1961 issues, we have named “pride in domestic practice” and it covers a period when, what we call “the women's lobby”, speaks in a uniform voice about the tasks of the housewife and the purpose of domestic cleaning. The second phase, manifest in the 1971 and 1981 issues, is termed “domestic dreaming”, and it heralds a period when Good Housekeeping calls its readership to dream about the potentials of a transformed consumer culture. The third phase, which is evident in some respects in 1981, but which is more clearly present in 1991 and 2001, we have called “modern advising in a late modern world”. During this period, Good Housekeeping settles into a new role as a modern advisor of cleaning products and practices within the context of a world that poses significant complexities. Our discussion also focuses on how three values of cleanliness; that associated with germs, aesthetics and efficiency/ease are present in the magazine. Our analysis is contextualised in relation to the cultural silencing of cleanliness in this period and related to social and cultural changes associated with feminism and consumer culture.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

2025Advances in Consumer Research 1994Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity 1993Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age.2012The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home 1990The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home 2005Risk Society 1985More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave 1996Selling Culture: Magazines, Markets and Class at the Turn of the Century

Cited by

2021From overt threat to invisible presence: discursive shifts in representations of gender in menstrual product advertising 2021Mrs Hinch, the rise of the cleanfluencer and the neoliberal refashioning of housework: Scouring away the crisis?2016Best for baby? Framing weaning practice and motherhood in web-mediated marketing 2019The knowing mother: Maternal knowledge and the reinforcement of the feminine consuming subject in magazine advertisements 2006Under the Kitchen Surface: Domestic Products and Conflicting Constructions of Home

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.