Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research

Per O. Seglen

238 citations0/0 files storedActa Orthopaedica Scandinavica

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Writing and Publishing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

(1998). Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica: Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 224-229.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 238 citations exist upstream.

References

1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation 1989Problems of citation analysis: A critical review 1992The skewness of science 1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review 1997Sense and nonsense about the impact factor 1976Structure of the Biomedical Literature 1994Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact 1990Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem

Cited by

2006What's in a Number? Issues in Providing Evidence of Impact and Quality of Research(ers)2010Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part I: the 100 top-cited papers in neurosurgical journals 2004Citation classics in critical care medicine 2003Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality 2015Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Cardiovascular Articles 2006A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.