Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research

9 references·16 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation2,781 cited
1989Problems of citation analysis: A critical review803 cited
1992The skewness of science713 cited
1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
1997Sense and nonsense about the impact factor286 cited
1976Structure of the Biomedical Literature246 cited
1994Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact239 cited
1990Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem176 cited
1990Quotational and Reference Accuracy in Surgical Journals129 cited

Cited by

2006What's in a Number? Issues in Providing Evidence of Impact and Quality of Research(ers)218 cited
2010Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part I: the 100 top-cited papers in neurosurgical journals215 cited
2004Citation classics in critical care medicine207 cited
2003Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality166 cited
2015Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Cardiovascular Articles149 cited
2006A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

143 cited

2013Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science134 cited

2010Using content-based and bibliometric features for machine learning models to predict citation counts in the biomedical literature110 cited

2013Citation Classics in Radiology Journals: The 100 Top-Cited Articles, 1945–2012105 cited

2001The Impact Factor: Time for Change103 cited

2006Top-cited articles in emergency medicine102 cited

2017The mismeasure of science: Citation analysis100 cited

2017Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation96 cited

2011H-index is a sensitive indicator of academic activity in highly productive anaesthesiologists: results of a bibliometric analysis93 cited

2009New Indices in Scholarship Assessment89 cited

2006The Journal Impact Factor: Too Much of an Impact?89 cited