SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Climate Change, Epistemic Trust, and Expert Trustworthiness
14 references·7 citing·31 second hop
Climate Change, Epistemic Trust, and Expert Trustworthiness (2012)Climate Change, Epistemic Trust, and Expe…Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (2011)Merchants of doubt: how a han…Defeating the merchants of doubt (2010)Defeating the merchants of do…Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance (2008)Agnotology: The Making and Un…On Telling and Trusting (2007)On Telling and TrustingThe philosophy of expertise (2006)The philosophy of expertiseThe Scientific Consensus on Climate Change (2004)The Scientific Consensus on C…Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust? (2001)Experts: Which Ones Should Yo…Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust? (2001)Experts: Which Ones Should Yo…Scientific Expert Testimony and Intellectual Due Process (1998)Scientific Expert Testimony a…Trust as an Affective Attitude (1996)Trust as an Affective AttitudeProfessional Ethics and Social Responsibility (1994)Professional Ethics and Socia…The Role of Trust in Knowledge (1991)The Role of Trust in KnowledgeTrust and Antitrust (1986)Trust and AntitrustEpistemic Dependence (1985)Epistemic DependenceScience Advice in an Environment of Trust: Trusted, but Not Trustworthy? (2022)Science Advice in an Environm…In Trust We Trust: Epistemic Vigilance and Responsibility (2022)In Trust We Trust: Epistemic …Experts, public policy, and the question of trust (2021)Experts, public policy, and t…Trust in Science (2020)Trust in ScienceRethinking the epistemic case against epistocracy (2018)Rethinking the epistemic case…Knowledge from scientific expert testimony without epistemic trust (2018)Knowledge from scientific exp…WHEN THE EXPERTS ARE UNCERTAIN: SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND THE ETHICS OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGMENT (2013)WHEN THE EXPERTS ARE UNCERTAI…The Polls Trends: Twenty Years of Public Opinion about Global Warming (2007)Doubt is their product: how industry's assault on science threatens your health (2009)Cool dudes in Norway: climate change denial among conservative Norwegian men (2018)Perceptions of climate change (2018)Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions (2019)Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (1986)Content Preservation (1993)Knowledge in a Social World (1999)Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy (2006)Peer Disagreement and Higher‐Order Evidence (2010)Rationality: a social-epistemology perspective (2014)The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. (2011)Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere (2012)Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming (2016)Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States (2011)Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing (2011)Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing (2015)Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature (2013)Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. (2017)Epistemic Injustice (2007)What Have We Learned About Generalized Trust, If Anything? (2008)The Epistemology of Resistance (2013)Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships (1998)Critical Citizens (1999)On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models (2021)Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment (1999)Why we don’t deserve credit for everything we know (2006)Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)On the Goals of Epistemic Education: Promoting Apt Epistemic Performance (2017)The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology (2021)Non-Ideal Epistemology (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming3,579 cited
  • 1986Trust and Antitrust2,565 cited
  • 2004The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change1,813 cited
  • 2008Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance1,498 cited
  • 1996Trust as an Affective Attitude1,251 cited
  • 1985Epistemic Dependence924 cited
  • 2001Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?910 cited
  • 1991The Role of Trust in Knowledge882 cited
  • 2010Defeating the merchants of doubt292 cited
  • 2001Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?201 cited
  • 1998Scientific Expert Testimony and Intellectual Due Process175 cited
  • 2007On Telling and Trusting169 cited
  • 1994Professional Ethics and Social Responsibility84 cited
  • 2006The philosophy of expertise73 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Rethinking the epistemic case against epistocracy119 cited
  • 2020Trust in Science62 cited
  • 2013

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

WHEN THE EXPERTS ARE UNCERTAIN: SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND THE ETHICS OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGMENT
52 cited
  • 2021Experts, public policy, and the question of trust49 cited
  • 2018Knowledge from scientific expert testimony without epistemic trust44 cited
  • 2022In Trust We Trust: Epistemic Vigilance and Responsibility31 cited
  • 2022Science Advice in an Environment of Trust: Trusted, but Not Trustworthy?19 cited