Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity: Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court

12 references·16 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1974Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change2,807 cited
1990Corporate culture and economic theory2,233 cited
1974Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes1,341 cited
1990Perspectives on Positive Political Economy899 cited
1988Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court439 cited
1984Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962-1981362 cited
1992On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making337 cited
1993Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court.273 cited
1992Deciding to decide: agenda setting in the United States Supreme Court256 cited
1992Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court199 cited
1981Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court154 cited
1979The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court136 cited

Cited by

2009Heurs et malheurs de la légalité dans les sociétés contemporaines. une sociologie politique de la « judiciarisation »113 cited
2001“Haves” Versus “Have Nots” in State Supreme Courts: Allocating Docket Space and Wins in Power Asymmetric Cases112 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2007Lawyers, Justices, and Issue Salience: When and How Do Legal Arguments Affect the U.S. Supreme Court?105 cited

2010Lobbying and Influence91 cited

2009Ducking Trouble: Congressionally Induced Selection Bias in the Supreme Court's Agenda84 cited

1998Explaining Executive Success in the U. S. Supreme Court82 cited

2010Who Sings in the Heavenly Chorus?81 cited

2010US Supreme Court Agenda Setting and the Role of Litigant Status70 cited

2004The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society70 cited

2002U.S. Government Litigation Strategies in the Federal Appellate Courts70 cited

1996Justices' Responses To Case Facts67 cited

2002The Allocation of Resources by Interest Groups: Lobbying, Litigation and Administrative Regulation60 cited

2007Does the Lawyer Matter? Influencing Outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada52 cited

2009Integrated political strategy45 cited

2005THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTEREST GROUP POLITICS IN AMERICA: Beyond the Conceits of Modern Times45 cited

2002The Allocation of Resources by Interest Groups: Lobbying, Litigation and Administrative Regulation40 cited