Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Juvenile offenders on trial: does alibi corroboration evidence and defendant age interact to influence jurors’ perceptions and verdicts?

10 references·1 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1999The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?682 cited
2000Youth on Trial: A Developmental Perspective on Juvenile Justice353 cited
2004What Makes a Good Alibi? A Proposed Taxonomy.108 cited
2009Children as victims, witnesses, and offenders: Psychological science and the law.107 cited
2001Reactions to youth crime: perceptions of accountability and competency*99 cited
2004An Aiibi Witness' Influence on Mock Jurors' Verdicts167 cited
2010Effects of an alibi witness’s relationship to the defendant on mock jurors’ judgments.53 cited
2003The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes53 cited
2011Juror decision making for juveniles tried as adults: the effects of defendant age, crime type, and crime outcome32 cited
2003Effectiveness of participation as a defendant: the attorney–juvenile client relationship30 cited

Cited by

2020Alibi believability: Corroborative evidence and contextual factors15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work