No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Abstract: We report on ongoing work towards a posteriori detection of illegal information flows for business processes, focusing on the challenges involved in doing so. Resembling a forensic investigation, our approach aims at analyzing the audit trails resultant from the execution of the business processes, locating informations flows that violate the (non-functional) requirements stipulated by security policies. The goal is to obtain fine-grained evidence of policy compliance with respect to information flows. Information flow (IF) characterizes the transfer of information from a classified container h to a public container l during the execution of a process [Lam73]. A “container ” can be a logical or physical device, such as a process instance, network socket, or variable. An IF is labeled “illegal ” whenever it violates the security policies expressing the non-functional requirements put on the execution of the process, in particular the confidentiality and noninterferability of pieces of information. Asserting that the executions of business processes do not allow illegal IF is essential in the context of regulatory compliance [KGM08], which is largely automated by business processes deployed over service-oriented architectures [AMK02]. Most of the compliance
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.