From IDEA to Implementation: A Discussion of Foundational and Future Responsiveness‐to‐Intervention Research

Amy Feiker Hollenbeck

72 citations0/0 files storedLearning Disabilities Research and Practice

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Behavioral and Psychological Studies Early Childhood Education and Development Educational Assessment and Improvement

Abstract

The IDEA reauthorization of 2004 highlights the application of responsiveness to intervention (RTI) to both early intervention (EI) service delivery and learning disabilities (LD) identification practices, creating the potential for wide‐scale execution. Implementation of any educational reform necessitates more than simply changing practices: It is important to understand the foundation upon which the reform stands, as well as the questions yet unanswered by research. This review of literature, therefore, emphasizes what is known about RTI as well as what remains to be learned, beginning with foundational concepts—model iterations—and moving to applications—EI and LD identification. Ultimately, the complexities of the RTI construct, with its potential for systemic change, necessitate a partnership between researchers and practitioners to both implement and further investigate RTI on a wide scale.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 72 citations exist upstream.

References

2006Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?1996Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability.2003Responsiveness–to–Intervention: Definitions, Evidence, and Implications for the Learning Disabilities Construct 2003Redefining Learning Disabilities as Inadequate Response to Instruction: The Promise and Potential Problems 2003Response to Instruction as a Means of Identifying Students with Reading/Learning Disabilities 1997Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap 1998Treatment Validity: A Unifying Concept for Reconceptualizing the Identification of Learning Disabilities.2005Responding to Nonresponders: An Experimental Field Trial of Identification and Intervention Methods

Cited by

2009What Special Education Directors Say about RTI 2009Obscuring Vital Distinctions: The Oversimplification of Learning Disabilities within RTI 2011Response to Intervention: Educators' Perceptions of a Three-Year RTI Collaborative Reform Effort in an Urban Elementary School 2013Frameworks for Response to Intervention in Early Childhood

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.