A pragmatic basis for mixed‐method designs

Lois‐ellin Datta

91 citations0/0 files storedNew Directions for Evaluation

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Evaluation and Performance Assessment Educational Research and Methods Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research

Abstract

Abstract A pragmatic framework for making decisions about mixed‐method designs is proposed and then applied to illustrative evaluations to help identify the strengths and limitations of making practical, contextual, and consequential considerations a primary basis for evaluation design decisions.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 91 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Case Study Research: Design and Methods 1988Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education: The Silent Scientific Revolution 1987Evaluator's Handbook 1986New Directions in Program Evaluation

Cited by

2017The time has come: a systematic literature review of mixed methods research in tourism 2015Mixed Methods Research 1999Toward an Integrative Framework for Evaluation Practice 2002The evolution of a project involving an integrated analysis of structured qualitative and quantitative data: From N3 to NVivo 1999Avaliação dos programas de saúde: perspectivas teórico metodológicas e políticas institucionais 2008Health Promotion Evaluation Practices in the Americas 2002Evaluating watershed management projects 2014Citizenship Education Goes Digital

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.