SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Is there a correlation between journal impact factor and researchers’ performance? A study comprising the fields of clinical nephrology and neurosciences
16 references·2 citing·41 second hop
Is there a correlation between journal impact factor and researchers’ performance? A study comprising the fields of clinical nephrology and neurosciences (2013)Is there a correlation between journal im…Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices (2009)Assessing scientific research…What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)What do citation counts measu…The Misused Impact Factor (2008)The Misused Impact FactorIs the h index related to (standard) bibliometric measures and to the assessments by peers? An investigation of the h index by using molecular life sciences data (2008)Is the h index related to (st…Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008)Are there better indices for …How impact factors changed medical publishing—and science (2007)How impact factors changed me…Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results (2007)Citation counts for research …The h index and career assessment by numbers (2006)The h index and career assess…Measures for measures (2006)Measures for measuresThe "impact factor" revisited (2005)The "impact factor" revisitedAn index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance (2002)Advantages and limitations in…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Sense and nonsense about the impact factor (1997)Sense and nonsense about the …Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact (1994)Causal relationship between a…Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications (1986)Evaluation of some methods fo…Scientific production of the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) researchers in the field of Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology granted with a scientific productivity fellowship (2018)Scientific production of the …Comparison of performance of researchers recipients of CNPq productivity grants in the field of Brazilian production engineering (2016)Comparison of performance of …Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (2001)Impact factors: use and abuse. (2003)Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis (2004)Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data (2005)Citation Statistics from 110 Years of Physical Review (2005)Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (2005)Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance (2006)Gender-Heterogeneous Working Groups Produce Higher Quality Science (2013)Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis (2018)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science (1988)The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators (2009)Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations (2010)Grounded Theory Methodology in Information Systems Research1 (2017)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Citation Statistics (2009)Big Scholarly Data: A Survey (2017)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. (1996)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations (2009)An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship (2010)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research (1998)The Journal “Impact Factor” (1998)Developing Corporate Governance Research through Qualitative Methods: A Review of Previous Studies (2012)Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality (1997)Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2008What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior1,598 cited
  • 2008Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine458 cited
  • 2006The h index and career assessment by numbers400 cited
  • 2007Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results359 cited
  • 2002Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance302 cited
  • 1997Sense and nonsense about the impact factor286 cited
  • 2006Measures for measures285 cited
  • 1994Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact239 cited
  • 2005The "impact factor" revisited229 cited
  • 2008The Misused Impact Factor181 cited
  • 1986Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications158 cited
  • 2009Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices130 cited
  • 2007

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

How impact factors changed medical publishing—and science
129 cited
  • 2008Is the h index related to (standard) bibliometric measures and to the assessments by peers? An investigation of the h index by using molecular life sciences data63 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Scientific production of the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) researchers in the field of Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology granted with a scientific productivity fellowship16 cited
    • 2016Comparison of performance of researchers recipients of CNPq productivity grants in the field of Brazilian production engineering15 cited