Range of Joint Movement in Female Dancers and Nondancers Aged 8 to 16 Years

Nili Steinberg · Israël Hershkovitz · Gali Dar · Youssef Masharawi · Michael Heim · Itzhak Siev‐Ner

114 citations0/0 files storedThe American Journal of Sports Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Diversity and Impact of Dance Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies Physical Education and Gymnastics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little data are available on changes that occur with age in joint range of motion in dancers and nondancers. HYPOTHESIS: In dancers, joint range of motion will increase with age, whereas it will decrease in nondancers, independent of the joint studied. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The study population included 1320 female dancers, aged 8 to 16 years, who participated in different types of dancing classes (classical ballet, modern dance, jazz, etc) and 226 nondancers of similar age. Range of motion was measured for the hip, knee, ankle, foot, and spinal joints. RESULTS: The pattern of differences in range of motion with age varied in different joints and types of movement. (1) For combined ankle and foot plantar flexion (pointe), ankle plantar flexion, and hip external rotation, there was no change in range of motion in dancers, whereas range of motion diminished with age in the nondancers. (2) For ankle dorsiflexion, neither group showed any change with age, and range of motion was significantly greater in the nondancer group. (3) For knee flexion, hip flexion, and hip internal rotation, range of motion decreased with age in both groups. (4) For hip abduction, range of motion decreased with age in dancers and remained constant in the nondancers. (5) For hip extension, range of motion increased in both groups. (6) For lower back and hamstrings, range of motion increased among dancers with age and remained constant among nondancers. CONCLUSION: Dancers and teachers should realize that passive joint range of motion is unlikely to improve with age. Therefore, the major goal of a dancing program should focus on exercises that retain the natural flexibility of the dancers' joints rather than trying to improve them.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 114 citations exist upstream.

References

2004The Dancer as a Performing Athlete 1992A profile of the musculoskeletal characteristics of elite professional ballet dancers 1995Overuse Injuries in Classical Ballet 2002Ballet Dancer's Turnout and its Relationship to Self-reported Injury 1999Hip and ankle range of motion and hip muscle strength in young female ballet dancers and controls.1987Lower extremity flexibility patterns in classical ballet dancers and their correlation to lateral hip and knee injuries 1975A New Consideration in Athletic Injuries

Cited by

2010Injury patterns in young, non-professional dancers 2013Injuries in Female Dancers Aged 8 to 16 Years

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.