SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts
16 references·9 citing·36 second hop
Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts (2007)Better reporting of randomized trials in …Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Full publication of results i…Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Editorial peer review for imp…Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance (2006)Effect of Blinded Peer Review…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey. (2004)The introduction, methods, re…BARRIERS TO FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION FOLLOWING PRESENTATION OF ABSTRACTS AT ANNUAL ORTHOPAEDIC MEETINGS (2003)BARRIERS TO FULL-TEXT PUBLICA…AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ORTHOPAEDIC ABSTRACTS AND SUBSEQUENT FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONS (2002)AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ORT…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles (1999)Accuracy of Data in Abstracts…Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting (1998)Unpublished Research From a M…Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1997)Uniform requirements for manu…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)More Informative Abstracts Re…A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. (1987)A proposal for more informati…A Proposal for More Informative Abstracts of Clinical Articles (1987)A Proposal for More Informati…Reporting Quality of Journal Abstracts for Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials Before and After the Implementation of the CONSORT Extension for Abstracts (2019)Reporting Quality of Journal …Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals (2019)Assessing the Quality of Abst…Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions (2018)Enhancing primary reports of …An interrupted time series analysis showed suboptimal improvement in reporting quality of trial abstract (2015)An interrupted time series an…Developing evidence-based dentistry skills: how to interpret randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews (2014)Developing evidence-based den…ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study (2013)ClinicalTrials.gov registrati…Quality of abstracts in articles submitted to a scholarly journal: A mixed methods case study of the journal Research in the Schools (2009)Quality of abstracts in artic…Does direction of results of abstracts submitted to scientific conferences on drug addiction predict full publication? (2009)Does direction of results of …Abstracts in high profile journals often fail to report harm (2008)Abstracts in high profile jou…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence (2009)Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. (2012)Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information (2010)The impacts of medication shortages on patient outcomes: A scoping review (2019)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2007Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts996 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 1990More Informative Abstracts Revisited524 cited
  • 2004The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey.364 cited
  • 1997Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors358 cited
  • 2007Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies312 cited
  • 1999Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles300 cited
  • 2003BARRIERS TO FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION FOLLOWING PRESENTATION OF ABSTRACTS AT ANNUAL ORTHOPAEDIC MEETINGS286 cited
  • 2002AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ORTHOPAEDIC ABSTRACTS AND SUBSEQUENT FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONS263 cited
  • 1998Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting262 cited
  • 2006Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

250 cited
  • 1987A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature.240 cited
  • 1987A Proposal for More Informative Abstracts of Clinical Articles233 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2013ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study31 cited
    • 2008Abstracts in high profile journals often fail to report harm30 cited
    • 2019Reporting Quality of Journal Abstracts for Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials Before and After the Implementation of the CONSORT Extension for Abstracts24 cited
    • 2018Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions23 cited
    • 2019Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals21 cited
    • 2009Does direction of results of abstracts submitted to scientific conferences on drug addiction predict full publication?21 cited
    • 2009Quality of abstracts in articles submitted to a scholarly journal: A mixed methods case study of the journal Research in the Schools18 cited
    • 2014Developing evidence-based dentistry skills: how to interpret randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews17 cited
    • 2015An interrupted time series analysis showed suboptimal improvement in reporting quality of trial abstract17 cited