Stability of the Reliability of LibQUAL+™ Scores: A Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis Study

Colleen Cook

47 citations0/0 files storedEducational and Psychological Measurement

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Library Science and Information Literacy Educational Assessment and Pedagogy

Abstract

The present study reports a reliability generalization (RG) meta-analysis of subscale and total scale scores on the Web-administered LibQUAL+™ protocol. Data were provided by 18,161 participantsfrom 43 universitiesin the United Statesand Canada. Results indicate that score reliabilities were remarkably invariant across campuses and different user groups.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 47 citations exist upstream.

References

2015Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings 1986Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory 1999Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.1991Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.2001Understanding Internal Consistency Reliability Estimates: A Conceptual Primer on Coefficient Alpha 1977Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization.2001Use of Structure Coefficients in Published Multiple Regression Articles: Β Is Not Enough 1998Reliability Generalization: Exploring Variance in Measurement Error Affecting Score Reliability Across Studies

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.