Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Missing the dog that failed to bark in the nighttime: on the overestimation of occurrences over non-occurrences in hypothesis testing

16 references·7 citing·46 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1998Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises7,230 cited
1977The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process4,168 cited
1960On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task2,104 cited
1987Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.2,095 cited
1971Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment1,819 cited
1994A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection.1,054 cited
2004Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making961 cited
1978Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction.937 cited
1977The Probable and The Provable873 cited
1995Varieties of Confirmation Bias756 cited
2006Optimal Predictions in Everyday Cognition645 cited
1965Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes.580 cited
1983Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective.539 cited
1976The cognitive side of probability learning.331 cited
2011Pure Reasoning in 12-Month-Old Infants as Probabilistic Inference318 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1986

Information-gathering processes: Diagnosticity, hypothesis-confirmatory strategies, and perceived hypothesis confirmation

310 cited

Cited by

2020Women, not objects: testing a sensitizing web campaign against female sexual objectification to temper sexual harassment and hostile sexism29 cited
2019On the Descriptive and Expressive Function of Derogatory Group Labels: An Experimental Test12 cited
2014Evidence evaluation: Measure Z corresponds to human utility judgments better than measure L and optimal-experimental-design models.11 cited
2012Moderators of the feature-positive effect in abstract hypothesis-evaluation tasks.7 cited
2012Integration of base rates and new information in an abstract hypothesis‐testing task5 cited
2013Insensitivity and Oversensitivity to Answer Diagnosticity in Hypothesis Testing5 cited
2023Individual Differences in the Susceptibility to the Feature-Positive Effect1 cited