SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Expert evidence in reports and courts
16 references·1 citing·34 second hop
Expert evidence in reports and courts (2013)Expert evidence in reports and courtsForensic Science Evidence in Question (2017)Forensic Science Evidence in …Contextual bias and cross-contamination in the forensic sciences: the corrosive implications for investigations, plea bargains, trials and appeals (2014)Contextual bias and cross-con…Expertise in Fingerprint Identification (2013)Expertise in Fingerprint Iden…The Cool Crucible: Forensic Science and the Frailty of the Criminal Trial (2012)The Cool Crucible: Forensic S…What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence? (2011)What role should investigativ…Convicting the innocent: where criminal prosecutions go wrong (2011)Convicting the innocent: wher…The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear. (2009)The testimony of forensic ide…Painting the target around the matching profile: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic DNA interpretation (2009)Painting the target around th…Failed Forensics: How Forensic Science Lost Its Way and How It Might Yet Find It (2008)Failed Forensics: How Forensi…Rethinking Expertise (2007)Rethinking ExpertiseRethinking Expertise (2007)Rethinking ExpertiseThe Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion (2002)The Daubert/Kumho Implication…Misunderstanding Science? (1996)Misunderstanding Science?Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom (1995)Interpreting Evidence: Evalua…Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 (1989)Institutional Ecology, `Trans…Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore (1985)Theories of Evidence: Bentham…Communicating forensic scientific expertise: An analysis of expert reports and corresponding testimony in Tasmanian courts (2019)Communicating forensic scient…Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? (1999)Communicating Statistical Information (2000)Do confessions taint perceptions of handwriting evidence? An empirical test of the forensic confirmation bias. (2013)On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect (2014)(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science (2020)Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. (1983)Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry (1992)Science studies: an advanced introduction (1998)Implementing context information management in forensic casework: Minimizing contextual bias in firearms examination (2015)A hierarchy of expert performance. (2016)Has Mendel's work been rediscovered? (1936)The Psychology of Confessions (2004)Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications (2005)Why confessions trump innocence. (2012)The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)Rate of false conviction of criminal defendants who are sentenced to death (2014)Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems (2000)The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences (2002)The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (2005)Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications (2007)Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage (2007)Cultural cognition of scientific consensus (2010)Evidence and Inference in Educational Assessment (1994)EVIDENCE AND INFERENCE IN EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT1,2 (1995)Abductive, presumptive and plausible arguments (2001)Theory and language of climate change communication (2009)Bringing values and deliberation to science communication (2013)For a Sociology of Expertise: The Social Origins of the Autism Epidemic (2013)Democracy and Expertise (2009)Three Educational Scenarios for the Future: lessons from the sociology of knowledge (2010)A model for case assessment and interpretation (1998)The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements (2000)Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1989Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-3910,821 cited
  • 2007Rethinking Expertise1,501 cited
  • 1996Misunderstanding Science?1,349 cited
  • 2007Rethinking Expertise885 cited
  • 1995Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom368 cited
  • 2011Convicting the innocent: where criminal prosecutions go wrong264 cited
  • 2002The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion263 cited
  • 1985Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore184 cited
  • 2009The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.102 cited
  • 2009Painting the target around the matching profile: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic DNA interpretation96 cited
  • 2011What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence?88 cited
  • 2008Failed Forensics: How Forensic Science Lost Its Way and How It Might Yet Find It87 cited
  • 2014Contextual bias and cross-contamination in the forensic sciences: the corrosive implications for investigations, plea bargains, trials and appeals77 cited
  • 2013Expertise in Fingerprint Identification71 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2017Forensic Science Evidence in Question42 cited
  • 2012The Cool Crucible: Forensic Science and the Frailty of the Criminal Trial36 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Communicating forensic scientific expertise: An analysis of expert reports and corresponding testimony in Tasmanian courts11 cited