SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Bibliometric evaluation of individual researchers: not even right... not even wrong!
0 references·13 citing·44 second hop
Bibliometric evaluation of individual researchers: not even right... not even wrong! (2009)Bibliometric evaluation of individual res…Towards establishing a research lineage via identification of significant citations (2021)Towards establishing a resear…Author-Suggested, Weighted Citation Index: A Novel Approach for Determining the Contribution of Individual Researchers (2021)Author-Suggested, Weighted Ci…Chris Callaghan’s criticism of the National Research Foundation’s rating methodology: A rebuttal (2018)Chris Callaghan’s criticism o…Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: The case of the Italian National Scientific Qualification (2016)Assessing evaluation procedur…Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: The case of the Italian National Scientific Qualification (2016)Assessing evaluation procedur…Double-Blind Peer Review: How to Slaughter a Sacred Cow (2014)Double-Blind Peer Review: How…Aquatic mammal science in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis for the first eight years of the Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals (2002-2010) (2014)Aquatic mammal science in Lat…Reverse-engineering conference rankings: what does it take to make a reputable conference? (2013)Reverse-engineering conferenc…An agent-based model for the bibliometric h-index (2013)An agent-based model for the …Rebooting the CS publication process (2011)Rebooting the CS publication …Peer Review and Bibliometric: Potentials and Problems (2011)Peer Review and Bibliometric:…Investigating the nature of scientific reputation (2011)Investigating the nature of s…Arrogance and ignorance in assessing scientific quality in a multidisciplinary academic medical centre (2010)Arrogance and ignorance in as…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Ranking Romanian academic departments in three fields of study using theg-index (2015)Ejes de discusión en la evaluación de la ciencia: revisión por pares, bibliometría y pertinencia (2016)Use of scholarly communication and citation-based metrics as a basis for university ranking in developing country perspective (2020)Protection of information in computer systems (1975)Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists (2009)Metrics: Do metrics matter? (2010)Publish now, judge later (2014)Being Reasonable (2015)A survey of accepted authors in computer systems conferences (2020)Achievement index climbs the ranks (2007)The Politics of Regional Integration in Latin America: Theoretical and Comparative Explorations (2009)The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship (2013)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution (1998)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Agent-based model for the h-index – exact solution (2016)Does the hα-index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? The introduction of agent-based simulations into scientometrics (2019)Ockham’s index of citation impact (2022)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Ranking computer science conferences using self-organizing maps with dynamic node splitting (2014)On evaluating the quality of a computer science/computer engineering conference (2017)Die Betriebswirtschaft (1953)Econometric policy evaluation: A critique (1976)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Not the ‘from the editors’: On guarding ‘topness’ (2021)Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature (2010)Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration (2010)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The impact of the national assessment exercises on self-citation rate and publication venue: an empirical investigation on the engineering academic sector in Italy (2018)On bibliometrics in academic promotions: a case study in computer science and engineering in Italy (2020)The impact of a national research assessment on the publications of sociologists in Italy (2021)The Chronicle of Higher Education (1977)Automatic classification of citation function (2006)Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis (2010)Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing (2012)Contextualised segment-wise citation function classification (2023)Exploring and evaluating the index for interdisciplinary breakthrough innovation detection (2024)Ensembling approaches to citation function classification and important citation screening (2025)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2016Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: The case of the Italian National Scientific Qualification22 cited
  • 2016Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: The case of the Italian National Scientific Qualification21 cited
  • 2013An agent-based model for the bibliometric h-index19 cited
  • 2014Double-Blind Peer Review: How to Slaughter a Sacred Cow16 cited
  • 2011Peer Review and Bibliometric: Potentials and Problems16 cited
  • 2013Reverse-engineering conference rankings: what does it take to make a reputable conference?14 cited
  • 2021Towards establishing a research lineage via identification of significant citations11 cited
  • 2011Rebooting the CS publication process10 cited
  • 2014Aquatic mammal science in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis for the first eight years of the Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals (2002-2010)8 cited
  • 2011Investigating the nature of scientific reputation7 cited
  • 2021Author-Suggested, Weighted Citation Index: A Novel Approach for Determining the Contribution of Individual Researchers7 cited
  • 2010Arrogance and ignorance in assessing scientific quality in a multidisciplinary academic medical centre7 cited
  • 2018Chris Callaghan’s criticism of the National Research Foundation’s rating methodology: A rebuttal5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work