Chris Callaghan’s criticism of the National Research Foundation’s rating methodology: A rebuttal

Abstract

No scientific endeavour -its methodologies, processes, procedures or anything related to it -should ever be above reproach, critical evaluation or reconsideration, including the methodology of South Africa's National Research Foundation (NRF) for rating those researchers who apply for a rating.Chris Callaghan's 1 views on the NRF rating methodology must thus be welcomed.However, any such criticism must be fair, balanced, objective, properly justified and uncontaminated by personal grievances

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.