SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Chris Callaghan’s criticism of the National Research Foundation’s rating methodology: A rebuttal
8 references·0 citing·42 second hop
Chris Callaghan’s criticism of the National Research Foundation’s rating methodology: A rebuttal (2018)Chris Callaghan’s criticism of the Nation…A review of South Africa’s National Research Foundation’s ratings methodology from a social science perspective (2018)A review of South Africa’s Na…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…The objectivity of national research foundation peer review in South Africa assessed against bibliometric indexes (2013)The objectivity of national r…Bibliometric evaluation of individual researchers: not even right... not even wrong! (2009)Bibliometric evaluation of in…Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? (2005)Impact of bibliometrics upon …Correcting glasses help fair comparisons in international science landscape: Country indicators as a function of ISI database delineation (2003)Correcting glasses help fair …Rank injustice (2002)Rank injusticeBenchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? (2002)Benchmarking international sc…The sociology of science (1973)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)The skewness of science (1992)The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence (2003)The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 (2012)The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits (2012)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)The politics of publication (2003)Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism (2007)University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison (2010)How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management (2012)Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations (1996)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Assigning evaluators to research grant applications: the case of Slovak Research and Development Agency (2013)Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data (2020)Evaluation of the national research foundation-rated researchers’ output at a South African university (2020)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact (1986)Science's new social contract with society (1999)Challenges for scientometric indicators: data demining, knowledge-flow measurements and diversity issues (2008)Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of R ussian science (1993–2010) (2012)Measuring excellence in R ussia: Highly cited papers, leading institutions, patterns of national and international collaboration (2014)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1964)The Subject and Power (1982)Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges (2012)Humanities, Citations and Currency: Hierarchies of Value and Enabled Recolonisation (2019)Research promotion strategies to enhance research productivity in Tanzanian higher educational institutions (2023)Turning academics into researchers: The development of National Researcher Categorization Systems in Latin America (2023)Competition and Careers in Biosciences (2001)Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors (2004)Graduate Students and the Culture of Authorship (2006)The mismeasurement of science (2007)An agent-based model for the bibliometric h-index (2013)Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: The case of the Italian National Scientific Qualification (2016)Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: The case of the Italian National Scientific Qualification (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2005Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?603 cited
  • 2002Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?251 cited
  • 2003Correcting glasses help fair comparisons in international science landscape: Country indicators as a function of ISI database delineation69 cited
  • 2002Rank injustice62 cited
  • 2009Bibliometric evaluation of individual researchers: not even right... not even wrong!25 cited
  • 2013The objectivity of national research foundation peer review in South Africa assessed against bibliometric indexes18 cited
  • 2018A review of South Africa’s National Research Foundation’s ratings methodology from a social science perspective18 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work