SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A preliminary inquiry into the effect of potentially biasing information on judges and jurors in civil litigation
0 references·16 citing·53 second hopsampled
A preliminary inquiry into the effect of potentially biasing information on judges and jurors in civil litigation (1994)A preliminary inquiry into the effect of …Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges (2017)Judging the Judiciary by the …When being wise after the event results in injustice: Evidence for hindsight bias in judges’ negligence assessments. (2016)When being wise after the eve…Motivated Cognition in Legal Judgments—An Analytic Review (2013)Motivated Cognition in Legal …The Psychology of Trial Judging (2011)The Psychology of Trial Judgi…Auditor liability: A comparison of judge and juror verdicts (2011)Auditor liability: A comparis…A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THE STATE'S FORENSIC SCIENCE AND MEDICAL EVIDENCE (2011)A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH TO THE …7 Is There a Psychology of Judging? (2010)7 Is There a Psychology of Ju…5 Judges as Members of Small Groups (2010)5 Judges as Members of Small …1 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry (2010)1 Motivation and Judicial Beh…Bias in jury selection: justifying prohibited peremptory challenges (2007)Bias in jury selection: justi…News media reporting on civil litigation and its influence on civil justice decision making. (2003)News media reporting on civil…Jurors'Evaluations of Expert Testimony: Judging the Messenger and the Message (2003)Jurors'Evaluations of Expert …Punitive damage decision making: The decisions of citizens and trial court judges. (2002)Punitive damage decision maki…Pretrial publicity and civil cases: A two-way street? (2002)Pretrial publicity and civil …The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence. (2000)The effect of jury deliberati…Legal blame: how jurors think and talk about accidents (2000)Legal blame: how jurors think…Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)New visual technologies in court: Directions for research. (2003)The Influence of Gruesome Verbal Evidence on Mock Juror Verdicts (2004)The effects of deliberations and religious identity on mock jurors’ verdicts (2011)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (2017)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. (1983)The disappearance of Madeleine McCann: Public drama and trial by media in the Portuguese press (2009)Strategic Litigation for Gender Equality in the Workplace and Legal Opportunity Structures in Four European Countries (2013)Prediction of outcome of construction dispute claims using multilayer perceptron neural network model (2015)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Criminal Justice and Behavior (1980)Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility (2000)Complainant Sexual History Evidence: Its Impact on Mock Jurors' Decisions (2002)Jurors’ Responses to Expert Witness Testimony: The Effects of Gender Stereotypes (2004)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Why People Obey the Law (2006)What is the “science of science communication”? (2015)Facts, Preferences, and Doctrine: An Empirical Analysis of Proportionality Judgment (2016)The Influence of Unique Information in Briefs on Supreme Court Opinion Content (2019)The American Jury. (1967)The American Jury (1971)Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. (1987)Credibility of the Emotional Witness: A Study of Ratings by Court Judges. (2006)An Examination of the Legal Liability Associated with Outsourcing and Offshoring Audit Procedures (2012)The gist of juries: Testing a model of damage award decision making. (2015)Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. (1982)Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (1987)Designing qualitative research (1989)Psychological Evidence at the Dawn of the Law's Scientific Age (2004)The Use of Religion in Death Penalty Sentencing Trials. (2006)Crime-Show-Viewing Habits and Public Attitudes Toward Forensic Evidence: The “CSI Effect” Revisited (2010)Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts (2001)Looking Deathworthy (2006)Effects of Male Defendants’ Attractiveness and Trustworthiness on Simulated Judicial Decisions in Two Different Swindles (2019)Curbing Journalistic Gender Bias: How Activating Awareness of Gender Bias in Indian Journalists Affects Their Reporting (2020)Biased and Biasing: The Hidden Bias Cascade and Bias Snowball Effects (2025)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)The Role of Case Complexity in Judicial Decision Making (2012)Judges and Friends (2014)Judges, ‘common sense’ and judicial cognition (2016)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)Considering the consequences of increased reliance on judicial assistants: a study on Dutch courts (2014)Evaluating the Effect of Law Clerk Gender on Voting at the United States Supreme Court (2016)On the psychology of prediction. (1973)Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making (2005)Confronting bias in judging: A framework for addressing psychological biases in decision making (2018)A meta-analysis of the emotional victim effect for female adult rape complainants: Does complainant distress influence credibility? (2019)Epistemic emotions in prosecutorial decision making (2023)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges68 cited
  • 2000The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence.65 cited
  • 2003Jurors'Evaluations of Expert Testimony: Judging the Messenger and the Message64 cited
  • 2003News media reporting on civil litigation and its influence on civil justice decision making.58 cited
  • 2011The Psychology of Trial Judging45 cited
  • 2000Legal blame: how jurors think and talk about accidents45 cited
  • 2013Motivated Cognition in Legal Judgments—An Analytic Review39 cited
  • 20105 Judges as Members of Small Groups36 cited
  • 20107 Is There a Psychology of Judging?36 cited
  • 2002Punitive damage decision making: The decisions of citizens and trial court judges.35 cited
  • 2016When being wise after the event results in injustice: Evidence for hindsight bias in judges’ negligence assessments.32 cited
  • 2011Auditor liability: A comparison of judge and juror verdicts31 cited
  • 20101 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry29 cited
  • 2002Pretrial publicity and civil cases: A two-way street?29 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2011
A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THE STATE'S FORENSIC SCIENCE AND MEDICAL EVIDENCE
27 cited
  • 2007Bias in jury selection: justifying prohibited peremptory challenges27 cited