Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implicationsMichaela Saisana, Béatrice d’Hombres, Andrea Saltelli2010-10-14articleResearch Policy320 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Higher Education Governance and Developmentscientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 320 citations exist upstream.References2008Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide2011Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress2005Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators2006Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth2014Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix2009The Challenge of Establishing World Class Universities2000Summary Indicators of Product Market Regulation with an Extension to Employment Protection Legislation2005Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques as Tools for the Quality Assessment of Composite IndicatorsCited by2017Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap2012Ratings and Rankings: Voodoo or Science?2016Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible?: A review of university rankings2018University rankings: What do they really show?2016Why do higher education institutions internationalize? An investigation of the multilevel determinants of internationalization rationales2015Rankings and university performance: A conditional multidimensional approach2015A comparative analysis of global and national university ranking systems2017Attempting to Imagine the Unimaginable: A Decolonial Reading of Global University Rankings