Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Can the use of reporting guidelines in peer-review damage the quality and contribution of qualitative health care research?

14 references·2 citing·33 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1968The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.46,361 cited
2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups42,389 cited
1968The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research39,440 cited
2017The Discovery of Grounded Theory25,772 cited
2005The SAGE handbook of qualitative research10,183 cited
2005Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research.7,634 cited
2005The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research2,267 cited
2007The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research2,168 cited
2002Argonauts of the Western Pacific2,159 cited
1967Strategies for Qualitative Research973 cited
2000Ethnography and health care445 cited
2008Questioning Qualitative Inquiry253 cited
2002Anthropology in health research: from qualitative methods to multidisciplinarity252 cited
2011Quality assurance of qualitative research: a review of the discourse117 cited

Cited by

2024How do you solve a problem like COREQ? A critique of Tong et al.’s (2007) Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

68 cited

2019Critical Appraisal of Qualitative Studies of Muslim Females’ Perceptions of Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators9 cited