SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Interrater reliability of grading strength of evidence varies with the complexity of the evidence in systematic reviews
12 references·2 citing·42 second hop
Interrater reliability of grading strength of evidence varies with the complexity of the evidence in systematic reviews (2013)Interrater reliability of grading strengt…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …CLINICAL HETEROGENEITY IN SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS: SYNTHESIS OF GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS AND THE LITERATURE (2012)CLINICAL HETEROGENEITY IN SYS…AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health-Care Program (2009)AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading …A simple and valid tool distinguished efficacy from effectiveness studies (2006)A simple and valid tool disti…Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. (2005)Understanding interobserver a…Antidepressant treatment and the risk of fatal and non-fatal self harm in first episode depression: nested case-control study (2005)Antidepressant treatment and …Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programs (2004)Rating the strength of scient…Antidepressants and the Risk of Suicidal Behaviors (2004)Antidepressants and the Risk …Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Systems to rate the strength …Assessing “Best Evidence”: Issues in Grading the Quality of Studies for Systematic Reviews (1999)Assessing “Best Evidence”: Is…High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes (1990)High agreement but low Kappa:…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…The impact of an online course on agreement rates of the certainty of evidence assessment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Approach: a before-and-after study (2024)The impact of an online cours…Automating Quality Assessment of Medical Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Model Development and Validation Study (2023)Automating Quality Assessment…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Consensus measurement in Delphi studies (2012)Content Analysis (2015)National Trends in the Prevalence and Treatment of Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults (2016)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Cultural Competence (2005)Bulimia nervosa treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (2007)Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings (2007)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life (2003)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications (2009)A meta-analysis of nonrandomized effectiveness studies on outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders (2013)Do Evidence-Based Interventions Work When Tested in the “Real World?” A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Parent Management Training for the Treatment of Child Disruptive Behavior (2013)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preparing psychologists for evidence-based school practice: Lessons learned and challenges ahead. (2007)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies (2008)A systematic review of enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT‐E) for eating disorders (2019)Prevention of suicide: aspirations and evidence (1994)Repetition of deliberate self-harm and subsequent suicide risk: Long-term follow-up study of 11 583 patients (2004)Antidepressant Drug Therapy and Suicide in Severely Depressed Children and Adults (2006)The Risk of Suicide With Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in the Elderly (2006)Relationship Between Antidepressants and Suicide Attempts: An Analysis of the Veterans Health Administration Data Sets (2007)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Association between suicide attempts and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: systematic review of randomised controlled trials (2005)Suicide Risk During Antidepressant Treatment (2006)The European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on suicide treatment and prevention (2011)High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes (1990)Bias, prevalence and kappa (1993)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)State-Transition Modeling: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-3 (2012)Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being (2014)Psychological treatments for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2005Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.7,009 cited
  • 1990High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes3,024 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2002Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence.880 cited
  • 2004Antidepressants and the Risk of Suicidal Behaviors588 cited
  • 2009AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health-Care Program512 cited
  • 2005Antidepressant treatment and the risk of fatal and non-fatal self harm in first episode depression: nested case-control study240 cited
  • 2006A simple and valid tool distinguished efficacy from effectiveness studies207 cited
  • 2004Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programs186 cited
  • 1999Assessing “Best Evidence”: Issues in Grading the Quality of Studies for Systematic Reviews134 cited
  • 2012CLINICAL HETEROGENEITY IN SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS: SYNTHESIS OF GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS AND THE LITERATURE33 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Automating Quality Assessment of Medical Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Model Development and Validation Study18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2024The impact of an online course on agreement rates of the certainty of evidence assessment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Approach: a before-and-after study11 cited