In the public eye

Alistair Black · Melvyn Crann

39 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Librarianship and Information Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Library Science and Administration Library Science and Information Literacy Information Science and Libraries

Abstract

Reports results of a study which aimed to apply the technique used to gather data for the Mass Observation Archive (MOA) to the study of user behaviour in the public library. The study was designed to provide an open access public commentary on the public library and reveal what the public library does well, what it does badly and what it means to both its users and non-users. The research also sought to demonstrate the validity of the mass observation (MO) method and its possible adaptation by library authorities for use at the local level. The data for the study was obtained from the written testimony of 231 contributions (64 men and 167 women) gathered from volunteers in response to the request for observations on public libraries and was gathered by the ‘autobiographical diary’ method, as employed by the MOA. The project was conceived in purely academic terms as a study of an ‘everyday’ social institution, the results of which could prove to be of interest in their own right and which could be said to reinforce the proposition that investigating the sociology of libraries tells us as much about society as it does about libraries. The discourse analysis which was applied to the data was used to reveal specific aspects of library use, including: general impressions; cuts in services; social exclusion; commercialization; use of computers; public place/private space issues; library staff; and buildings, design and ambience. The project was judged to be a success and it is concluded that the MO approach to studying library use is a practical and useful one. Although there are methodological deficiencies inherent in the MO method (subjectivity of views, temptation to embellish observations, unrepresentative nature of the volunteer panel), these can be allowed for in the final data evaluation.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 39 citations exist upstream.

References

2000Research Methods for Business Students 2000Open to All? The Public Library and Social Exclusion 1997Understanding Community Librarianship: The Public Library in Post-Modern Britain 1976The effective library: Report of the Hillingdon Project on Public Library Effectiveness

Cited by

2010Making a difference: ethical consumption and the everyday 2022“Part of My Daily Life”: The Importance of Public Libraries as Physical Spaces 2011‘We don’t do public libraries like we used to’: Attitudes to public library buildings in the UK at the start of the 21st century 2004Investigating non-use of libraries in the UK using the mass-observation archive 2006"Boundless opportunities?": towards an assessment of the usefulness of the concept of social exclusion for the South African public library situation 2009Perceptions of archives, libraries, and museums in modern Britain 2010The Library of Birmingham Project: Lifelong Learning for the Digital Age 2015Sustaining Nigeria's Democracy: Public Libraries as an Indispensable Instrument in Anambra State

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.