SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The effects and their stability of field normalization baseline on relative performance with respect to citation impact: A case study of 20 natural science departments
14 references·10 citing·46 second hop
The effects and their stability of field normalization baseline on relative performance with respect to citation impact: A case study of 20 natural science departments (2010)The effects and their stability of field …Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: Some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) paper (2010)Towards an ideal method of me…Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010)Rivals for the crown: Reply t…Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)Measuring contextual citation…Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance (2010)Caveats for the journal and f…Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance (2008)Subfield-specific normalized …A new reference standard for citation analysis in chemistry and related fields based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts (2008)A new reference standard for …Lifting the crown—citation z-score (2007)Lifting the crown—citation z-…The publishing imperative: the pervasive influence of publication metrics (2006)The publishing imperative: th…Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation (2005)Relativity of citation perfor…Citation analysis of research performer quality (2002)Citation analysis of research…Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? (2002)Benchmarking international sc…Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators (1996)Cross-field normalization of …New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995)New bibliometric tools for th…Reference standards for citation based assessments (1993)Reference standards for citat…How can citation impact in bibliometrics be normalized? A new approach combining citing-side normalization and citation percentiles (2020)How can citation impact in bi…Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the leiden rankings (2019)Statistical significance and …On the interplay between normalisation, bias, and performance of paper impact metrics (2019)On the interplay between norm…Four pitfalls in normalizing citation indicators: An investigation of ESI’s selection of highly cited papers (2018)Four pitfalls in normalizing …Quantifying and suppressing ranking bias in a large citation network (2017)Quantifying and suppressing r…Conceptual difficulties in the use of statistical inference in citation analysis (2016)Conceptual difficulties in th…Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Supplementary Report I to the…How variable are the journal impact measures? (2014)How variable are the journal …Analysing robustness and uncertainty levels of bibliometric performance statistics supporting science policy. A case study evaluating Danish postdoctoral funding (2014)Analysing robustness and unce…A novel approach to citation normalization: A similarity‐based method for creating reference sets (2014)A novel approach to citation …The sociology of science (1973)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)The skewness of science (1992)The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence (2003)The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 (2012)The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits (2012)Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact (1986)Journal impact measures in bibliometric research (2002)Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? (2009)Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report (2016)Interpreting Bibliometric Data (2021)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations (2010)Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing (2011)Field Normalization of Scientometric Indicators (2019)Assessing basic research (1983)Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (2001)New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation (2009)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers (1963)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison (2012)A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators (2013)How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations (2013)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Citation analysis and peer ranking of Australian social science journals (2010)The VQR , I taly's second national research assessment: Methodological failures and ranking distortions (2015)Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level (2021)Mapping the backbone of science (2005)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications (2011)Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents (2011)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation (2017)Are female researchers less cited? A large‐scale study of Norwegian scientists (2011)Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis (2011)A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals624 cited
  • 1995New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications499 cited
  • 2007Lifting the crown—citation z-score274 cited
  • 2002Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?251 cited
  • 2010Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance190 cited
  • 2005Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation171 cited
  • 1996Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators147 cited
  • 2010Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff104 cited
  • 2008Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance100 cited
  • 2006The publishing imperative: the pervasive influence of publication metrics91 cited
  • 2002Citation analysis of research performer quality79 cited
  • 2010Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: Some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) paper54 cited
  • 1993Reference standards for citation based assessments52 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2008
A new reference standard for citation analysis in chemistry and related fields based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts
49 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Four pitfalls in normalizing citation indicators: An investigation of ESI’s selection of highly cited papers31 cited
  • 2017Quantifying and suppressing ranking bias in a large citation network28 cited
  • 2020How can citation impact in bibliometrics be normalized? A new approach combining citing-side normalization and citation percentiles21 cited
  • 2014A novel approach to citation normalization: A similarity‐based method for creating reference sets21 cited
  • 2019On the interplay between normalisation, bias, and performance of paper impact metrics19 cited
  • 2014Analysing robustness and uncertainty levels of bibliometric performance statistics supporting science policy. A case study evaluating Danish postdoctoral funding17 cited
  • 2016Conceptual difficulties in the use of statistical inference in citation analysis16 cited
  • 2014How variable are the journal impact measures?16 cited
  • 2015Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management16 cited
  • 2019Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the leiden rankings14 cited