SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

(Meta)analyze this: Systematic reviews might lose credibility · Study

Review(Meta)analyze this: Systematic reviews might lose credibility

Peter Humaidan2012

Review2012

(Meta)analyze this: Systematic reviews might lose credibility

Peter Humaidan · Nikolaos P. Polyzos

34 citations·0/0 files stored·Nature Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare Clinical practice guidelines implementation

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 34 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

Cited by

2024Enhancing systematic literature review adapting ‘double diamond approach’2019Apparently conclusive meta-analyses on interventions in critical care may be inconclusive—a meta-epidemiological study 2023When do we need to do meta-analysis!!!2020Concordance between systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in assisted reproduction: an overview 2013Systematic reviews deserve more credit than they get 2013Cancer, meta-analysis and reporting biases: the case of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological sciencearticle · 1 shared reference 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neurosciencereview · 1 shared reference 2011False-Positive Psychologyarticle · 1 shared reference 2016The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debatearticle · 1 shared reference 2017A manifesto for reproducible sciencearticle · 1 shared reference 2013The New Statisticsarticle · 1 shared reference

Details

Year2012

Typereview

Published2012-09-01

VenueNature Medicine

ISSN-L1078-8956

Languageen

Citations34

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1038/nm0912-1321

openalex_workW2018488341

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.