Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

(Meta)analyze this: Systematic reviews might lose credibility

1 references·6 citing·24 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,571 cited

Cited by

2024Enhancing systematic literature review adapting ‘double diamond approach’16 cited
2019Apparently conclusive meta-analyses on interventions in critical care may be inconclusive—a meta-epidemiological study10 cited
2023When do we need to do meta-analysis!!!9 cited
2020Concordance between systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in assisted reproduction: an overview5 cited
2013Systematic reviews deserve more credit than they get5 cited
2013Cancer, meta-analysis and reporting biases: the case of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work