Canonical and Sociocultural Approaches to Research and Reform in Science Education: The Story of Juan and His Group

Charles Anderson · J. David Holland · Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar

78 citations0/0 files storedThe Elementary School Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Science Education and Pedagogy Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies Science Education and Perceptions

Abstract

Recent reforms have emphasized scientific literacy for all Americans as a key goal of science education. In this article we compare 2 approaches to defining functional scientific literacy and helping students to achieve it. The first, which we label a canonical approach, focuses on the knowledge, skills, and habits of mind of literate individuals. The second, which we label a sociocultural approach, focuses on language, values, personal identity, and other factors that affect an individual's participation in the activities of a community. Both canonical and sociocultural approaches can play a useful role in analyzing events in science classrooms. It has been helpful to us to think of the students as orchestrating the complex interplay among 3 types of foci for their attention: interpersonal relationships, scientific activity, and task requirements. We show with a case study of a group of 5 sixth graders from our research how the interplay of these factors can subvert the scientific intentions of a group activity. In this case, interpersonal relationships among students and their interpretations of the task requirements led to the scientific activity being appropriated largely by the most academically successful member of the group. Further progress in science education will require new approaches to teaching and curriculum that combine tools and insights from canonical and sociocultural traditions. The resource needs of classrooms that engage all students in authentic scientific activity will be substantial. However, the costs to society of failing to make these investments will also be substantial. Without them we see little hope of achieving functional scientific literacy for all Americans.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 78 citations exist upstream.

References

1995National Science Education Standards 1982Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change 1984Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms 1988The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People's Children 1994Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups 1987Reflections on Gender and Science 1990Science for all Americans 1985Children's ideas in science

Cited by

1999Sociocognitive roles in science group discourse 1999Appropriating scientific practices and discourses with future elementary teachers 2002The case of Carla: Dilemmas of helpingallstudents to understand science 2013Pervasive Management of Project-Based Learning: Teachers as Guides and Facilitators 2016Tensions Teaching Science for Equity: Lessons Learned From the Case of Ms. Dawson 2018Interpreting Integrated STEM: Sustaining Pedagogical Innovation Within a Public Middle School Context

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.