Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Why do states enfranchise citizens abroad? Comparative insights from Mexico, Italy and Belgium

14 references·16 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2000Immigration and the Boundaries of Citizenship: The Institutions of Immigrants' Political Transnationalism424 cited
2008The emigration state and the modern geopolitical imagination395 cited
2003Transnational migration and the redefinition of the state: Variations and explanations372 cited
2007Stakeholder Citizenship and Transnational Political Participation. A Normative Evaluation of External Voting349 cited
2005Should Expatriates Vote?*312 cited
2002The Mexican State and Transmigrant Organizations: Negotiating the Boundaries of Membership and Participation298 cited
1999Transnational migrant communities and Mexican migration to the US203 cited
2003Diasporic Memberships in Historical Perspective: Comparative Insights from the Mexican, Italian and Polish Cases192 cited
2007Home and Away: The Construction of Citizenship in an Emigration Context164 cited
2006Diaspora engagement policies: what are they and what kinds of states use them?141 cited
2007Voting from abroad : the International IDEA handbook139 cited
2010Extending Citizenship to Emigrants: Democratic Contestation and a New Global Norm129 cited
2007Extraterritorial Political Rights and Dual Citizenship in Latin America121 cited
1998Interests Not Passions: Mexican-American Attitudes toward Mexico, Immigration from Mexico, and Other Issues Shaping U.S.-Mexico Relations

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

60 cited

Cited by

2014The political choices of emigrants voting in home country elections: A socio-political analysis of the electoral behaviour of Bolivian external voters98 cited
2014Diffusion of Diaspora Enfranchisement Norms93 cited
2015“Keeping Pandora's (ballot) box half-shut”: a comparative inquiry into the institutional limits of external voting in EU Member States93 cited
2015The enfranchisement of citizens abroad: variations and explanations88 cited
2012Ideologies of nationhood in sending-state transnationalism: Comparing Surinam and Turkey80 cited
2014The impacts of extra-territorial voting: Swings, interregnums and feedback effects in New Zealand elections from 1914 to 201179 cited
2019Reading diasporic engagements through the lens of citizenship: Turkey as a test case65 cited
2017Diaspora policies in comparison: An application of the Emigrant Policies Index (EMIX) for the Latin American and Caribbean region64 cited
2011Assessing Emigrant Participation in Home Country Elections: The Case of Mexico’s 2006 Presidential Election62 cited
2019Why do parties support emigrant voting rights?53 cited
2016“Sending so much more than money”: exploring social remittances and transnational mobility48 cited
2021To vote or not to vote? Migrant electoral (dis)engagement in an enlarged Europe46 cited
2015The Implementation of Voting from Abroad: Evidence from the 2014 Turkish Presidential Election43 cited
2013The political transnationalism of Ecuadorians in Barcelona, Madrid and Milan: the role of individual resources, organizational engagement and the political context35 cited
2017From emigrants to free movers: whither European emigration and diaspora policy?35 cited
2018Passed, regulated, or applied? The different stages of emigrant enfranchisement in Latin America and the Caribbean33 cited