SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average
7 references·16 citing·44 second hop
Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average (2011)Peer-review in a world with rational scie…Einstein Versus the Physical Review (2005)Einstein Versus the Physical …Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Effects of Editorial Peer Rev…Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)Reproducibility of peer revie…Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Effect on the Quality of Peer…Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Nepotism and sexism in peer-r…The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)The Philosophical Basis of Pe…Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Publication prejudices: An ex…Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on publons (2022)Gender differences among acti…The role of mainstreamness and interdisciplinarity for the relevance of scientific papers (2020)The role of mainstreamness an…Peer review assessment of originality in tourism journals: critical perspective of key gatekeepers (2019)Peer review assessment of ori…On Performance of Peer Review for Academic Journals: Analysis Based on Distributed Parallel System (2019)On Performance of Peer Review…A scoping review of simulation models of peer review (2019)A scoping review of simulatio…The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures (2018)The peer review game: an agen…Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication (2017)Evaluating alternative system…Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers? (2017)Can editors save peer review …Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game (2016)Peer review and competition i…Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data (2015)Complex systems approach to s…Ranking Games (2014)Ranking GamesMechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism (2014)Mechanism change in a simulat…Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure (2012)Saint Matthew strikes again: …Social Simulation That 'Peers into Peer Review' (2011)Social Simulation That 'Peers…Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding (2011)Peer Review, Program Officers…How to create an innovation accelerator (2011)How to create an innovation a…The Born-Einstein Letters (1971)Subtle is the Lord (1982)‘SUBTLE IS THE LORD.…’ The science and life of Albert Einstein (1983)From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review (2014)Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing (2020)The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science (2024)Publication and related biases. (2000)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals (2019)The American Psychological Association (1919)Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1971)Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders (1975)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)Toward an Integration of Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives on Social Inference: A Biased Hypothesis-Testing Model (1987)Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020)Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems (2002)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Arbitrariness in the peer review process (2020)Bias in peer review (2012)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)A Layered Framework for Considering Open Science Practices (2018)What does better peer review look like? Underlying principles and recommendations for better practice (2019)Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention (1962)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists (2015)How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia (2019)Investigating the division of scientific labor using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) (2020)Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences (2003)The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics (2007)Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Nepotism and sexism in peer-review1,346 cited
  • 1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
  • 1990The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation436 cited
  • 2002Effects of Editorial Peer Review347 cited
  • 1998Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports334 cited
  • 2000Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?254 cited
  • 2005Einstein Versus the Physical Review100 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Ranking Games134 cited
  • 2017Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?80 cited
  • 2017Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication71 cited
  • 2016Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game70 cited
  • 2012Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure62 cited
  • 2020The role of mainstreamness and interdisciplinarity for the relevance of scientific papers53 cited
  • 2018The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

53 cited
  • 2011How to create an innovation accelerator45 cited
  • 2019On Performance of Peer Review for Academic Journals: Analysis Based on Distributed Parallel System43 cited
  • 2019A scoping review of simulation models of peer review38 cited
  • 2011Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding35 cited
  • 2015Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data34 cited
  • 2011Social Simulation That 'Peers into Peer Review'31 cited
  • 2019Peer review assessment of originality in tourism journals: critical perspective of key gatekeepers30 cited
  • 2022Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on publons29 cited
  • 2014Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism28 cited